<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/16/5-0l-v8-to-return-in-the-2010-mustang/</link>
<description>Autoblog Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/16/5-0l-v8-to-return-in-the-2010-mustang/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/16/5-0l-v8-to-return-in-the-2010-mustang/</guid><description><![CDATA[ROLLING in my 5.0<br>With my ragtop down so my hair can blow!<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Glenn]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 16th 2008 3:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/16/5-0l-v8-to-return-in-the-2010-mustang/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/16/5-0l-v8-to-return-in-the-2010-mustang/</guid><description><![CDATA[about time!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[freckles]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 16th 2008 4:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/16/5-0l-v8-to-return-in-the-2010-mustang/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/16/5-0l-v8-to-return-in-the-2010-mustang/</guid><description><![CDATA[DAMMIT!!  You beat me to it.........]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Travis]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 16th 2008 4:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/16/5-0l-v8-to-return-in-the-2010-mustang/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/16/5-0l-v8-to-return-in-the-2010-mustang/</guid><description><![CDATA[The girlies on standby waving just to say hi<br>Did you stop? No! I just drove by ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rndmnme]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 16th 2008 4:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/16/5-0l-v8-to-return-in-the-2010-mustang/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/16/5-0l-v8-to-return-in-the-2010-mustang/</guid><description><![CDATA[Will it ever stop yo I don't know! ;)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Randy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 16th 2008 8:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/16/5-0l-v8-to-return-in-the-2010-mustang/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/16/5-0l-v8-to-return-in-the-2010-mustang/</guid><description><![CDATA[oh the good old 5.slow mustang, lets hope the new one has power to match its displacement]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dale]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 16th 2008 4:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/16/5-0l-v8-to-return-in-the-2010-mustang/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/16/5-0l-v8-to-return-in-the-2010-mustang/</guid><description><![CDATA[Back in the day the 5.0 was the shiznit.  It was putting out 225hp when Accords weren't breaking 100.  Of course it only weighed 2800lb, about the size of the current Corolla, so you didn't need 400hp to get down the road.  That's probably why the 98hp Accord was considered peppy while todays 158hp Camry is considered just adequate.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Disgruntled Goat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 16th 2008 5:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/16/5-0l-v8-to-return-in-the-2010-mustang/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/16/5-0l-v8-to-return-in-the-2010-mustang/</guid><description><![CDATA[sorry but comparing a 5 litre v8 to a 1.6 i4 isn't a comparison, especially when the japanese can get almost half the horsepower from about a third of the displacement.  consider also that european cars were getting the same horsepower as the 5 litre from half the cylinders and 2 litres.  as per my previous comment, hopefully this new 5L v8 will be better than the old one.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dale]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 16th 2008 10:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/16/5-0l-v8-to-return-in-the-2010-mustang/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/16/5-0l-v8-to-return-in-the-2010-mustang/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wait, how big of a refresh exterior wise are we all expecting?<br><br>With gas around where I live currently being $3.89, I really don't care about a 5.0L engine. I really like the new Camaro, especially if Chevy goes with that 2.0T set-up. 2 litres can make good enough horsepower these days and a turbocharger is always fun. (I know turbos have lag and all but they're still plenty of fun. :) ) And the exterior of the new Camaro is great!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[User]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 16th 2008 6:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/16/5-0l-v8-to-return-in-the-2010-mustang/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/16/5-0l-v8-to-return-in-the-2010-mustang/</guid><description><![CDATA[How much of an exterior refresh? Complete.. the only body panel that will remain the same is the roof.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TKOsoccer03]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 17th 2008 12:43AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/16/5-0l-v8-to-return-in-the-2010-mustang/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/16/5-0l-v8-to-return-in-the-2010-mustang/</guid><description><![CDATA[So a 100 hp 1L engine is better than a 300 hp 5L?   You're welcome to it then, more power for me.<br><br>Displacement is just a means to an end.  Makes all the sense of ranking a gearbox by its toothcount.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 17th 2008 3:03AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/16/5-0l-v8-to-return-in-the-2010-mustang/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/16/5-0l-v8-to-return-in-the-2010-mustang/</guid><description><![CDATA[The refreshed 2010 Mustang will be carrying a new V8 and it will displace 5 liters.  It's speculated in the Ford community it will be packing over 400hp and be standard on the Mustang GT.  Ford Australia will also be getting this engine as will the F-150 and Ford's SUVs.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TriShield]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 16th 2008 4:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/16/5-0l-v8-to-return-in-the-2010-mustang/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/16/5-0l-v8-to-return-in-the-2010-mustang/</guid><description><![CDATA[What ever happened with all that talk of using the twin-force..er..Ecoboost engines in the Mustang?  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul P.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 16th 2008 4:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/16/5-0l-v8-to-return-in-the-2010-mustang/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/16/5-0l-v8-to-return-in-the-2010-mustang/</guid><description><![CDATA[The EcoBoost engines will probably still be there, but as a special edition V6. They'll be like the SVO to this Mustang's GT 5.0.<br><br>Frankly, as long as they put in a reasonably powerful and fuel efficient V6 I don't care if they give it a V10 Lambo engine.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[The Luigiian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 16th 2008 5:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/16/5-0l-v8-to-return-in-the-2010-mustang/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/16/5-0l-v8-to-return-in-the-2010-mustang/</guid><description><![CDATA[They might do so, still.  I can see a boosted four-cylinder--akin to Mazda's DISI 2.3--doing a much better job than the Explorer's 4.0L six currently does.<br><br>It might not be a whole lot faster, or even much more fuel efficient, but at least it'd sound a little healthier. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[psarhjinian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 16th 2008 5:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/16/5-0l-v8-to-return-in-the-2010-mustang/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/16/5-0l-v8-to-return-in-the-2010-mustang/</guid><description><![CDATA[How about putting in the 2.3L Duratec engine with a sweet turbocharger? If you got the power output high enough (225+ HP) you go yourself a nice four banger. Haven't seen a RWD 1-4 sports car since what? the 240Z?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr Cool]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 16th 2008 6:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/16/5-0l-v8-to-return-in-the-2010-mustang/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/16/5-0l-v8-to-return-in-the-2010-mustang/</guid><description><![CDATA[Mr. Cool: The 240Z was a 6cyl, same as every other Z Nissan(Datsun) made after that.<br><br>The MazdaSpeed3 2.3L DI Turbo would be a great engine to use. 270HP+ easily, and the RWD Mustang platform could probably handle it much better.  On a decent day you might see 29mpg too.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[zmf001]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 16th 2008 11:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/16/5-0l-v8-to-return-in-the-2010-mustang/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/16/5-0l-v8-to-return-in-the-2010-mustang/</guid><description><![CDATA["Mr. Cool: The 240Z was a 6cyl, same as every other Z Nissan(Datsun) made after that."<br><br>i imagine he was referring to the 240SX ... which was not a 6 cylinder. and was one of the last cheap FR I4 coupes around. (not counting the Miata / etc. as they are not hardtops... but roadsters.)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[010111]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 17th 2008 8:55AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/16/5-0l-v8-to-return-in-the-2010-mustang/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/16/5-0l-v8-to-return-in-the-2010-mustang/</guid><description><![CDATA[2010 GT <br>5.0L 4v<br>400hp/360tq  <br>3550-3600lbs]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 16th 2008 4:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/16/5-0l-v8-to-return-in-the-2010-mustang/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/16/5-0l-v8-to-return-in-the-2010-mustang/</guid><description><![CDATA[It won't be a GT.. it will be a Boss.. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TKOsoccer03]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 16th 2008 4:47PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>