Ford has been in the cross hairs of environmentalists for years, but the Blue Oval is now out of the solar-powered dog house after detailing its environmental plans to activist shareholders. The Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility and the Investor Network on Climate Risk Network are now giving Ford the green thumbs up after FoMoCo detailed its initiative to reduce emissions by 30-percent by 2020. That date is also when all automakers have to hit 35 mpg for all US-sold cars and trucks, so the Dearborn, MI automaker can't forsake CO2 for fuel economy. Ford group VP of sustainability Sue Cischke told the Free Press that the automaker could detail its plans because the company has been working on a green plan for three years.Since Ford was the first company to pledge a specific and detailed reduction plan to the two environmental groups, the Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility and the Investor Network on Climate Risk Network will use Ford's promise as an example for other companies. Hit the jump to view the press release.
[Source: Autoblog Green and Free Press]
Press Release:
Shareholders Laud Ford as First U.S. Automaker to Set 'Clearly Defined Goal' For a Major Cut In Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Religious, Pension Fund Shareholder Resolutions Key to Step Taken by Ford
DETROIT and NEW YORK, April 9 /PRNewswire/ -- Religious and other institutional investors joined today with Ford Motor Co. (NYSE: F) in announcing that Ford is the first U.S. auto company to spell out how it plans to reach the goal of reducing by at least 30 percent the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from its new vehicle fleet by 2020. The decision by Ford to publish its emission target came in the wake of climate-related shareholder resolutions put forward by members of the Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility (ICCR) and the Investor Network on Climate Risk Network (INCR) organized by Ceres.
As a result, related Ford shareholder resolutions have been withdrawn by: the Sisters of St. Dominic of Caldwell, NJ and other members of ICCR, which is a group of nearly 300 religious institutional investors representing over $100 billion in invested funds; and the Connecticut State Treasurer's office, which is active in INCR, a $5 trillion network of investors that promotes better understanding of the financial risks and opportunities posed by climate change. Connecticut holds 565,246 shares of Ford with market value $3,668,446.54 (as of April 7, 2008).
In March, Ford presented concerned investors with a detailed analysis of its fuel emissions goals showing how the 30 percent emissions reduction would be achieved in a manner consistent with the 60-80 percent CO2 reductions by 2050 that Ford and dozens of other U.S. companies have agreed to as part of the U.S. Climate Action Partnership. Previously, the most any U.S. auto company has agreed to do on GHG emissions is to undertake enhanced reporting of climate-related impacts or set a general GHG goal without showing how it would be reached.
Beyond Ford, religious investors are urging General Motors to set specific greenhouse gas reduction targets for its vehicles and operations. A shareholder resolution also filed by The Dominicans of Caldwell is expected to be voted on at GM's annual meeting in June 2008.
Sister Patricia A. Daly, OP, executive director, Tri-State Coalition for Responsible Investment, and representative for the Sisters of St. Dominic of Caldwell, NJ, the lead resolution filer, said: "Ford breaks new ground here as the first corporation to respond to shareowners by agreeing to pursue a specific and clearly defined target for climate-related emissions in their new products. The target is not even the win here; Ford has wrestled with various analyses to arrive at reduction goals. No other company has entered into this discipline. This goes far beyond acknowledging global warming or disclosing emissions. Even as a leader in the 'carbon club' Ford opens the door for other companies and industries to target reductions."
"Ford has spent more than three years studying a range of potential actions we would need to take to achieve these reductions in CO2 emissions," said Sue Cischke, group vice president, Sustainability, Environment and Safety Engineering, Ford Motor Company. "We shared our findings with these institutional investors to help them understand our commitments and strategy. We recognize much work remains to be done and we look forward to continued collaboration in addressing the challenges of climate change."
Connecticut State Treasurer Denise L. Nappier said: "Climate change is a long-term, mounting problem, and for any company to maintain its future shareholder value, it must go from being silent on this issue to moving in the right direction by mitigating the potential financial harm posed by climate change. For this reason, Ford's welcomed response to our climate change resolution is a defining moment in the automotive industry, and I hope it will challenge industry procrastinators. Others may say they're focused on future business growth and success, but they need to step up to the plate and likewise take responsive action. By publicly acknowledging that climate change will affect the auto industry and by committing to taking measurable action to increase fuel economy and reduce CO2 emissions over a specified time, Ford is making news. I encourage other auto companies to follow Ford's lead and help shape a sustainable environment conducive for business growth and success."
Laura Berry, executive director, Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility said: "ICCR's model of long-term and persistent engagement by institutional investors who are concerned about all aspects of corporate performance - environmental, social, ethical and financial - is beginning to transform how corporations solve problems and navigate difficult new challenges. Ford's leadership in this area has emerged as a new corporate governance standard on climate."
Mindy Lubber, president of Ceres and director of the Investor Network on Climate Risk said: "Ford is taking a critical first step to align its products with the climate change challenge before us. But, let's not fool ourselves, this step is only a beginning. Ford, as well as General Motors, need to do much more, and quickly, to reclaim their leadership role in the global marketplace."
The withdrawals come one month after investors announced that a record 54 global warming shareholder resolutions have been filed with U.S. companies as part of the 2008 proxy season, which is nearly double the number filed two years ago. Companies targeted with resolutions include electric power companies, oil and coal producers, airlines and other businesses that investors believe are not adequately dealing with potential climate-related business impacts, whether from physical changes, emerging climate regulations or growing global demand for low-carbon technologies and services.
This year's filings come on the heels of a record high number of resolutions and record high voting support for global warming resolutions in the 2007 proxy season. Investors filed 43 resolutions with U.S. companies last year and average voting support was 21.6 percent. The shareholder filings are coordinated by the Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility and the Ceres investor coalition.
Personal vehicle use accounts for nearly 20 percent of CO2 emissions domestically and represents the second-largest source of greenhouse gas emissions in the U.S. From 1990 to 2006, transportation-related GHG emissions rose by 28 percent due in part to increased travel and a vehicle sales mix that included a significant percentage of larger vehicles.
ABOUT THE GROUPS
The Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility (http://www.iccr.org) is a coalition of nearly 300 faith-based institutional investors, representing over $100 billion in invested capital. ICCR members bridge the divide between morality and markets by envisioning a civic economy that integrates ethical, environmental and social values. Inspired by faith, committed to action, ICCR members work to build a just and sustainable global community.
Ceres is a leading coalition of investors, environmental groups and other public interest organizations working with U.S. companies to address sustainability challenges such as climate change. Ceres also directs the Investor Network on Climate Risk (INCR), a group of 60 institutional investors with collective assets totaling $5 trillion focused on the business impacts of climate change. For more information, visit http://www.ceres.org or http://www.incr.com.













Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
berne1 @ Apr 11th 2008 7:36AM
Umm, yeah.
I think they also pledged to build 250,000 hybrids a year by 2010? Don't hold your breath on this one, either.
Randy @ Apr 11th 2008 12:04PM
I don't thank anyone will be making that many! But, I must mention that Ford has been building Hybrids since 1996 with their Flex Fuel cars. They are way ahead of the times on that. As well the Model T was the first Ethanol powered car. So going green is 90 years old for Ford.
I read that the Ethanol was not available to consumers so Ford had to base it on gasoline. Thank the gov for that one!
Dude @ Apr 11th 2008 8:49AM
Who cares what some self-serving environmental group thinks? These groups are nothing more than the modern version of Y2K companies. It's all about the money.
Timsvtgen1 @ Apr 11th 2008 9:44AM
What for Profit company isn't for money?
Timsvtgen1 @ Apr 11th 2008 9:45AM
sarcasm... sorry.
BlackbirdHighway @ Apr 11th 2008 9:45AM
I seem to remember Ford making a very similar announcement back in the 90's, just before they launched the Excursion. That was the last we heard of it until now. Just standard PR BS.
Dan @ Apr 11th 2008 10:10AM
Lose the halo vehicles and I'm sure you can cut emissions down by %50 or more. No more SVT crap.
Mike @ Apr 11th 2008 10:37AM
Uh,
That's a joke right? You really think halo cars, from any company, much less Ford make up any noticable difference in overall fleet fuel economy?
Get real.
Dan @ Apr 11th 2008 12:26PM
Uhm... yes. Considering that SVT vehicles, mustangs, lightnings, and the GT account for 46% of Ford's sales. Yes, yes I am serious. Perhaps "halo" was the wrong word.
I only say rid these cars b/c, unfortunately, laborers and backwoods people still need trucks.
Judy Zik @ Apr 11th 2008 5:08PM
Mustangs, Lightnings and GT's make up 40% of Ford's sales???? Care to actually back that claim up with a link and some facts. Last I checked Mustang sales were in the toilet and they weren't making Lightnings and GT's anymore. If Ford had 40% of it's sales coming from these things it would be phenomenally profitable.
Let me help you out...
http://media.ford.com/article_display.cfm?article_id=27952
Al @ Apr 11th 2008 12:39PM
2020?? Isn't that a good 2 - 3 engine generations away? Even if you consider the fact that half of Ford sales are still from gas guzzling trucks, isn't 2020 a bit too lenient?
I was just reading up on a new generation of diesel engines that Mercedes - Benz just introduced, which is gonna make 204 hp from a 2.2...
GM is in the near future going to launch an electric vehicle which looks like a serious threat to your avg. IC engined car (once they get the prices right). It is also actively implementing technologies such as cylinder deactivation, hybrid drivetrains, and diesel engines into their lineup. Not only that, they are also going back to 6 and 4 cylinder engines for the mainstream sedans...by 2020 THEY would have reduced their corporate emissions probably by a lot more than just 30%...
Agreed that making a more efficient product is more expensive, but isn't that deadline a bit too far? By all means, if GM's Volt is anything close to success, then by 2020 a good portion of (atleast the urban) vehicles sold would be electric....not to mention that Hydrogen is also starting to find its feet...
2020 is too far away...they need to, and - I am sure that if they applied themselves - could reduce emissions by 30% within half the time. 2015 sounds about right.
gumbo koontz @ Apr 11th 2008 2:00PM
Those idiotic environmentalist like to pick on Ford then go home and light up fireplaces without thinking about the smokes billowing out of naked chimneys and stove pipes. Smoke float all over the towns and hamlets. Oh boy, we love the smell of wood smoke or forest fires... no difference.. Americasn are bam bam dumb!!!
JimmyG @ Apr 11th 2008 2:34PM
This is not a heroic effort. According to the EPA there's a direct correlation, all else being equal, between CO2 emissions and fuel economy. If Ford has to boost its corporate car and truck combined average fuel economy to 35 mpg by 2010 (this year's car CAFE mandate is 27.5 mpg and the truck CAFE is 22.5 mpg), that automatically means a corresponding drop in greenhouse gas emissions.
JimmyG @ Apr 11th 2008 2:39PM
In case anyone's counting, I figure that comes to about a 30 percent increase in corporate average fuel economy, i.e. a 30 percent decrease in greenhouse gas emissions.
44 mpg by 2010 @ Apr 11th 2008 7:39PM
In Europe Ford product has already accomplished the following:
There are no vehicles below 28 mpg(Imperial) [24 mpg(US)].
There are only 8 vehicle configurations rated between 28 and 31 mpg(Imperial) [24 and ~25 mpg(US)] combined cycle; CO2 greater than 235 g/km .
There are 12 vehicle configurations between 61 and 70 mpg(Imperial) [~50 and ~58 mpg(US)] combined cycle (none above 66 mpg(Imperial)]; CO2 less than 120 g/km.
http://www.vcacarfueldata.org.uk/search/fuelConSearch.asp
For what it is worth.