<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/10/iihs-midsize-smack-down-side-impact-ratings-better-rear-crashe/</link>
<description>Autoblog Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/10/iihs-midsize-smack-down-side-impact-ratings-better-rear-crashe/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/10/iihs-midsize-smack-down-side-impact-ratings-better-rear-crashe/</guid><description><![CDATA[Who will save us from the idiots who put to much faith in the ultrasonic systems?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TW6Speed]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 10th 2008 11:37AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>