Add your comments
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments.
New KITT Attack Mode revealed at Comic Con
London 2008: Honda OSM concept roadster says, "Cheerio!"
London 2008: Lotus unveils the Evora
2010 Chevy Camaro - Official Details and Images
2010 Chevy Camaro - LIVE from the reveal
In the Autoblog Garage: Aprilia RSV 1000 R
First Drive: Maserati Quattroporte S in Europe
First Drive: 2008 MINI Cooper S JCW
In the Autoblog Garage:2009 Nissan GT-R
North American Exclusive First Drive: Alfa MiTo
Reader Comments for
Subscribe to this threadIIHS midsize smack down: Side impact ratings better, rear crashes, not so much
(Page 1 of 1)
Derek @ Apr 10th 2008 10:22AM
I don't want the extra weight, expense and size that your proposal would force on new cars just because you are a poor driver. If you are that "dazed" behind the wheel, it is simple: YOU SHOULD NOT BE DRIVING. Pull off the road and stop endangering MY LIFE. I suppose we're lucky that you are in bumper-to-bumper traffic where the worst that will happen is a bit of wrinkled sheetmetal; if you have problems maintaining attention at slow speeds I can only imagine the hazard you would pose at highway speeds.
As a diver, I want sole control of the steering, brakes and throttle. Having a computer step in and second-guess my commands is just as bad as a passenger grabbing the wheel.