Add your comments
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments.
New KITT Attack Mode revealed at Comic Con
London 2008: Honda OSM concept roadster says, "Cheerio!"
London 2008: Lotus unveils the Evora
2010 Chevy Camaro - Official Details and Images
2010 Chevy Camaro - LIVE from the reveal
First Drive: Maserati Quattroporte S in Europe
First Drive: 2008 MINI Cooper S JCW
In the Autoblog Garage:2009 Nissan GT-R
North American Exclusive First Drive: Alfa MiTo
First Drive: 2009 Kia Borrego
Reader Comments for
Subscribe to this threadIIHS midsize smack down: Side impact ratings better, rear crashes, not so much
(Page 1 of 1)
Ian @ Apr 10th 2008 9:58AM
I disagree with you because people need to be responsible for themselves. Stop relying on the manufacturer to do it for you. Why is it so hard to pay attention when you're driving? And how is this gonna help you avoid collision unless YOU'RE the one playing with the Navi or on the Cell phone. Its gonna warn me a half second before someone hits me? That's useful. If you can't park the car you own, you shouldn't own it. You don't NEED ultrasonic parking. How long did people drive without these? 70 years? And they seem to have gotten along just fine. Stop thinking that people need LESS involvement with driving. They need MORE.