<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/09/big-refund-for-brits-busiest-speed-camera-deemed-unlawful/</link>
<description>Autoblog Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/09/big-refund-for-brits-busiest-speed-camera-deemed-unlawful/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/09/big-refund-for-brits-busiest-speed-camera-deemed-unlawful/</guid><description><![CDATA[this doesn't surprise me at all.  you think the D.O.T didn't know that sign has been unlit for 3 years?   Speed trap for sure.  Same thing here in the U.S cities. I've seen everything from signs being left knocked down to signs behind trees, signs in sharp corners, etc etc.  <br><br>..You would think it would be dangerous to not make signs visible, but apparently thats not what signs are for these days   haha]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[k.w.a]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 9th 2008 7:39PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>