
Click above for high-res gallery of the 2008 Saturn Astra
Enthusiasts here in the States have long wondered why they couldn't buy Ford and GM small cars from Europe, and at least part of the answer has been that Americans don't want to pay big bucks for premium small cars. Spiking gasoline prices have quelled that argument, and fuel economy is now towards the top of shoppers' lists when looking for a new car or truck.
While Ford is still more than a year away from bringing over the Euro Focus and Fiesta, GM has made the cross-Atlantic jump by importing the Opel Astra to our shores. The Astra is a hot-selling hatch in Europe with high-end amenities and very good fuel economy, and the model is shipping to the U.S. differentiated from its Euro twin by some Saturn logos and little else. We were itching to get our hands on an Astra to see if it were as good as advertised, and our tester came equipped with everything Saturn could throw at the vehicle. Hit the jump to see how the 2009 Saturn Astra fared in the Autoblog Garage.
All photos Copyright ©2008 Chris Shunk / Weblogs, Inc.
click any image to enlarge

Our Salsa Red five-door Saturn Astra XR came equipped with 17-inch wheels, leather seating surfaces and an enormous dual-panel sunroof that brought the price tag to $21,955. Features like ABS and traction control, keyless entry, cruise control and moisture sensitive automatic wipers are sometimes optional in midsize offerings, but you get those features standard in the Astra.
Building cars in Europe and shipping them across 3,000 miles of ocean isn't cheap, and GM wants to make sure nobody mistakes the Astra for an economy commuter. By virtue of its rear hatch and athletic stance, the Astra looks the part of a Euro small car. Large, five-spoke wheels and rich-looking finish give onlookers the impression that the Astra is no run-of-the-mill econobox.


During our time behind the wheel of the Astra, people took notice -- young people especially. At one point I was stopped at a red light when I got the distinct impression that someone was staring at me. I looked to the right and saw three young ladies in a beat-up Pontiac Grand Am looking my way. Just as I grinned and thought, "Still got it!" it became obvious that their attention was fixed on the car. How many Saturns in the past five years have elicited that type of response from teenagers?

On the inside, the Astra XR is far better than any small car that GM has created in its 100-year history, at least in the U.S. Soft-touch materials; comfortable, supportive leather seats; and a terrific little steering wheel that feels like it belongs in something more expensive made us want to be inside the sporty little Astra for more than just running errands. Our favorite option was by far the monstrous panoramic moonroof that looks like it belongs in a Cadillac or Mercedes, not a $22,000 car. The retractable roof panel spans the entire length of the front seats, with the rear section reaching all the way to the back seats.

While Americans appear to be allergic to hatchbacks, we have no idea what the fuss is about. Not only do they often look great, their added cargo capacity is a real plus. From the outside, the Astra's hatch looks almost trivial, but pop the liftgate and there's a cavernous hole ready to swallow a bunch of your stuff. If more room is needed, simply fold the rear seats and you've got enough space for a trip to Costco.
At times while driving the Astra, we felt that the stylish hatch wasn't really designed with the U.S. in mind. While fit and finish is terrific, some features seem more European than Yank-centric. For example, how many $22,000 hatchbacks don't have a center armrest? The Astra is the only one we can think of off-hand. While it does have three cupholders, they're all within three inches of one another and the front-most drink cozy sits a couple of inches behind this blogger's right elbow.


The Astra also comes with a 3.5-inch display screen that provides the driver with information like fuel economy, stereo functions, and trip info. The two-tone display is easy to read, but the interface takes some getting used to. Redundant controls on the steering wheel also take some remembering, as there is no text to tell you which button does what. The first hour with the Astra was a bit of a headache, but we eventually caught on.

On the road, the Astra's European ride and handling were a real plus. Its quick-ratio electro-hydraulic power steering is crisp and well-weighted, which gave us the urge to drive the 2,900-lb hatch with more abandon than we probably should. A long, 102.9-inch wheelbase pushes the wheels to the far corners, which helps provide a sportier ride while also offering additional cabin space. The Astra's suspension is firm yet still comfortable enough for everyday driving, and we happily tackled corners and entrance ramps at speed. The Astra seems to prefer being driven vigorously since it doesn't protest with body roll and the tires found no reason to squeal. If you do wander across the line of good sense, the traction control system steps in and helps you regain composure.
While we would have liked a little more pop at the pedal, the Astra's 138-hp 1.8L four-cylinder was more than adequate for most driving conditions. The optional four-speed automatic transmission was smooth and capable, but as usual, a five-speed manual would have been more fun and probably more fuel efficient. That said, fuel economy was an impressive 28 mpg in mixed driving conditions, which is the best fuel economy this blogger has had in any car over the past year. While the standard four-banger was sufficient, the Astra's lively driving characteristics beg for the 260-hp direct-inject turbo 2.0L found in all manner of SS, GXP and Red Line vehicles here in the U.S. Short of that, we'd happily accept the 240 horses offered in the Euro-spec Astra OPC.
The Saturn Astra isn't going to be a sales volume leader and it's far from being the least expensive small car on the block, but the Euro five-door has the looks, quality, handling and charisma to compete with the best brands in the small car arena like VW and Honda. Enthusiasts have been begging for a hot European small car here in the U.S., and with the Saturn Astra, GM has finally delivered.
All photos Copyright ©2008 Chris Shunk / Weblogs, Inc.













Reader Comments (Page 1 of 5)
Chris @ Apr 8th 2008 12:06PM
not your typical run of the mill econo-box?
DUH, the damn thing is too expensive to be an econo box.
Hell its a small car priced like many competitors MID SIZED cars. In other words, over priced to an extreme.
Saturn, boldly going where Oldsmobile did and failed, hell even their logo was shaped the same; probably because they originally were going to be sold under that nameplate
Dazza @ Apr 8th 2008 12:21PM
Most Saturn Astras are priced between $17.5K and $20.5K - the same as other good modern small offerings such as the Mitsubishi Lancer, VW Golf/Rabbit, Toyota Corolla, Honda Civic and Mazda 3. Given that the Astra also has the hurdle of dealing with a very weak US Dollar against the Euro, I think GM have done a decent job with its pricing.
why not the LS2LS7? @ Apr 8th 2008 12:29PM
This, in my opinion, is why we don't see a lot of European small cars migrate over here.
Many Americans think a more expensive car should always be bigger. It makes it tough for Saturn to bring this car here. It makes it tough for Ford to bring the Euro Focus here. It makes it tough for Honda to bring the top-range Euro Civic Si here.
I'm not putting down people who think this way, but if you do feel that money should always buy size, this car will likely not satisfy you.
I am keenly interested in seeing what happens with this car. The Mazda3 is somewhat pricey and has done well and the Audi A3 is very pricey and has done pretty well. I am interested in seeing if rising gas prices make nicer but more expensive small cars a viable market in the US.
Disgruntled Goat @ Apr 8th 2008 2:15PM
why not the LS2/LS7? You took the words out of my mouth. Bigger = better is why so many SUVs sell in the US yet we get no good small cars. That's also why you can't get a true luxury car with really good gas mileage. This mentality sux.
Owen @ Apr 8th 2008 8:53PM
That's not a fair statement Chris, the 22K that this test vehicle is VERY well equipped, don't forget that on the low end, including AC and delivery, these are 16,955. That includes very impressive list of standard features as well in a car that just does not "feel" like an econobox as it has a premium feel even in base trim levels.
Standard features like;
4-one touch power windows, Heated mirrors, Cruise Control, Trip computer, exterior Temp display, Tilt AND telescoping wheel, 4 wheel disk brakes w/ ABS, variable speed wipers with rain sense, dual illuminating vanity mirrors, front, side and curtain airbags, TPMS, DRL, Engine immobilizer, etc... the list goes on man.
These are standard features that are either not available or are parts of option packages on your typical super econoboxes like the Fit, Civic, Corolla, Etc... This car IS a bargain. It's not a Ford, but "Drive One" and see. I drove it a few weeks ago and my ONLY complaints were the lack of power, which I could live with and the gearing ratios in the Manual transmission which could have been spaced a little better IMHO. But neither will keep me from buying an '09 for my wife next year. Hopefully they will make the switch to the 1.4 liter turbo ecotec.
FThorn @ Apr 8th 2008 12:06PM
If I had a dollar for everytime I read a car tester mention people looking at them or their car.....
Yar @ Apr 8th 2008 12:09PM
"How many Saturns in the past five years have elicited that type of response from teenagers? "
Sky?
That makes two...
Zane @ Apr 8th 2008 12:09PM
How many $22,000 hatchbacks don't have a center armrest?
Umm.. how about (possibly) the best selling hatchback in the U.S. - the MINI Cooper/CooperS.
Joe K. @ Apr 8th 2008 12:19PM
Having driven one at the Saturn launch here at Giants stadium and then giving it a look in better lighting at the New York Auto Show, i have to say it is a nice car. My biggest problem with it is the same problem I have with the Mazda3 hatch, the wheel wells interfere with the trunk space so badly that no long objects can be stored (Golf clubs!) I realize many of my generation have given up on the sport, but in 02 when I bought the Protege5 it could swallow multiple sets without having to lay down a seat; perfect for a threesome or foursome. It could do that and had exceptional handling (could have used the 2.3 for pep though)
All in all I can appreciate that wheels at the corners with very small overhangs make for a fun car to drive, but don't take away my other hobbies please!
MUSASHI66 @ Apr 8th 2008 12:21PM
That is waaaaaay better fuel mileage than Car and Driver got out of it...
shrique @ Apr 8th 2008 2:20PM
I always assume that C&D is flogging the living h3ll out of a car. I figure that would be a worse case scenario of how I would drive the car but not an everyday scenario.
BassClef @ Apr 8th 2008 2:35PM
C/D got 27MPG out of a Scion xB 1.5L manual, a car I regularly get 33-35MPG from with a heavy foot. Their fuel economy results are usually the lowest possible any human in North America can come up with.
Xcountryflyer @ Apr 8th 2008 2:42PM
I would take C&D MPG as the low-end of what you'd get if you were taking the car out and flogging it all day around a track or a course.
In the C&D test, it scored one point behind the brand new bland and generic Snore-rolla for 4th out of 8 cars. Unfortuntely, the car needs a bit more oomph and I am sure it would have scored much higher. However, contrast this with a scathing 8th place by the new Focus.
Note to GM--this is the right direction. Note to Ford--going in the wrong direction so fast it hurts.
psarhjinian @ Apr 8th 2008 12:21PM
The reason this car is so good is that it has to compete with the Golf and Focus (and a host of other excellent small hatches). The bar is very, very high and the market hypercompetitive.
Here, the market is split in half, between premium products like the Golf and 3, and bottom-feeders like the Cobalt and Focus. GM has, traditionally, benchmarked Ford and Chrysler (and vice versa) which is why the compact cars we've seen have been so generally awful (I mean, really, how much better did the Cavalier have to be in order to line up against the Escort and Neon). Ford broke the mold with the (expensive-to-make) 99/00 Focus, which was an amazing car (much better than the Civic, and so far ahead of the Cavalier it was embarassing). The problem is that the buyers never materialized and Ford was eating margin dollars on every Focus they sold, while GM reaped the benefit of the cheaper (but still poor) Cobalt/Ion.
Hopefully Saturn does better. They have slightly better demographics than Ford does, but the Focus was a better product, relative to it's 2000 contemporaries than the Astra relative to it's. Saturn is going head-to-head with the 3 and Rabbit, which will be very, very hard to do as, good as the Astra is, it isn't _that_ good.
DetroitWhat @ Apr 8th 2008 12:24PM
Umm I am not sure you can tell Chris, but Oldsmobile's logo was a rocket, which looks nothing like a planet.
psarhjinian @ Apr 8th 2008 12:29PM
The last interation (the spiked O) could have been interpreted that way.
why not the LS2LS7? @ Apr 8th 2008 12:32PM
Both were a silver frame with interior silver/white lines on a red background. The Olds logo was waller and narrower, the Saturn logo was almost square.
One being of a rocket and one being of the planet Saturn (or a cursive S) also adds to the similarities.
I still don't buy into his comments slamming Saturn though.
Richard Warren @ Apr 8th 2008 12:34PM
DUH, the damn thing is too expensive to be an econo box.
Hmmmm
$16,495.00 Base Retail for an XE
$21,655.00 For XR 5 with every option
$25,869 2.4L 4-cyl, XRS, 5-Speed Automatic
$21,943 MAZDA3 s Grand Touring 5-Door
DanMan @ Apr 12th 2008 3:17PM
Yeah but this thing is a European export and with the dollar to euro ratio right now, GM could have a hit with it and not make any money.
germanbuick @ May 3rd 2008 12:08AM
Mine was 19,300+some change,cloth heated seats,cruise,A/C,6-cd,5-spd,
p-locks,windows,Onstar,a basic little car,getting 25 mpg avg.,w/ a lead foot,
And when you shut the door,it doesn't sound like a tin box.3DR-XR.It is the cheapest german car I could find.Had an old one,1973 Opel Manta, drove it till 1999,
Couldn't kill it.