<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog - Comments for Audi planning TT and R8 lightweight "Sport" models</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/08/audi-planning-tt-and-r8-lightweight-sport-models/</link>
<description>Autoblog Comments for Audi planning TT and R8 lightweight "Sport" models</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Audi planning TT and R8 lightweight "Sport" models]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/08/audi-planning-tt-and-r8-lightweight-sport-models/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/08/audi-planning-tt-and-r8-lightweight-sport-models/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Nagma, where are you getting 2772? Audiusa.com says 2965 unladen. Just curious.<br><br>Also, unfortunately, the 2.0 variants only come in wrong wheel drive, so you'd (well, I would) want the 3.2 variant, which is about 3200+ pounds. These are all for the coupe variants as well. <br><br>Anyway, looking forward to these lightweight versions.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[R]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 8th 2008 3:29PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>