Filed under: Auction Action, Supercars, Lamborghini, Celebrities
Innuendo Alert: Jenna Jameson's Lamborghini sold on eBay
We've had too many opportunities to redefine the term "auto erotic" lately. As if the ongoing saga of FIA president Max Mosley's alarming sexual encounters or the mating habits of exotic automobiles weren't enough, here come the results of what could very well be the celebrity auto auction of the year: Jenna Jameson's Lamborghini.
For those who pretend they don't know who Jenna Jameson is, she's perhaps the world's most famous, er..."adult film star". (We had to look it up on Wikipedia, of course.) While her clothes may be consistently a couple of sizes too small, it's only fitting that the starlet should drive the most explicit erotic exotic supercar on the market: the Lamborghini Murcielago. It's hard to believe she didn't go topless this time -- Jameson actually went for the coupe, which she bought in 2002. Since then, Jenna's yellow Raging Bull has done 11,658 miles. In case there was any doubt that Jameson could handle a stick like a pro, the Lambo is equipped with a six-speed manual (instead of smacking it around with the paddles) and decked out in black leather (naturally) offset by blonde highlights (yellow topstitching). The car was advertised - *ahem*, tongue in cheek - as "extremely clean" and "ready to go", and as our compatriots over at CarScoop pointed out, there's a decent chance there's some tread left on the tires. Complete with dual front airbags (hey-o!), the car sold on Friday for a video-on-demand Buy-It-Now price of $182,900 on eBay Motors.
Check out the perfectly-safe-for-work images in the gallery below to oggle the car (yeah right). Oh, and feel free to contribute your own innuendos in the comments section below that...just keep it clean until after 10pm.
[Source: eBay Motors]
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)
Mike 11:27AM (4/06/2008)
Actually, I think that might be the least skin I've ever seen in a Jenna Jameson photo.
Justyn 10:59AM (4/06/2008)
Actually, it never did sell (the "best offers" on it were declined or expired), and has been relisted....
Reply
CarbonBlack 7:31PM (4/06/2008)
I don't know if I would eat off of that car's carpet/seats.
Who knows what kind of all natural moisturizers has been applied to the leather?
barrow.jay 11:02AM (4/06/2008)
Im all for free speech, especially on the internet. But having her picture as the first thing listed when I pull up a auto news site, seems.... decieving. I think autoblog could find an easy way to convey the topic at hand without so much skin involved. Perhaps a portrait?
-Conservative in Kansas City.
Reply
franke 11:05AM (4/06/2008)
Maybe stay off the internet?
Andrew 11:42AM (4/06/2008)
What, are you 12 or something?! There's nothing wrong with seeing a woman's legs or midsection.
-Dr. in Chicago
Eddie 12:01PM (4/06/2008)
Do you also get offended when you walk into a store and see a mannequin dressed in a tank top?
Eddy Alvarez 12:02PM (4/06/2008)
Don't be a ninny, conservative from Kansas City.
-conservative from Miami
Seminole 12:30PM (4/06/2008)
Prude.
Tyler Mayes 1:21PM (4/06/2008)
Do the Victorias Secret ads that are all over the place offend you as well? That picture is TAME compared to the other media that we are exposed to every day. Get over yourself, or just stay off the internet.
compy386 1:55PM (4/06/2008)
I have to agree with barrow.jay here. There are quite a lot of good website I visit that shows off a little skin. They're quite fine with me, I enjoy reading stuff uncensored. However, Autoblog is a website I like to frequent at work and mainly because unlike 99% of the other websites out there it's relatively clean. I can't read gaming websites like Kotaku because it's got a lot of NSFW and the same goes for news sites like Fark. Now this picture is by no means bad and it will by no means stop me from visiting autoblog at work, but I'd still rather not have pictures like it show up in my internet browsing records that IT peruses over. If autoblog were to show many of these pictures it won't stop me from frequenting this website. However, I just won't be looking at it while I'm at work. In short out of context this picture wouldn't do me any favors if my managers are reviewing my internet records.
e90+335i 2:15PM (4/06/2008)
He's not prude, you are just too corrupted
Zeus.:God 2:33PM (4/06/2008)
You make me ashamed to be from Kansas City...
JD 4:11PM (4/06/2008)
Conservative in Kansas City-
That IS the picture of Jameson with the least amount of skin. And come on now, it's the internet. That's the most family friendly pic of Jameson out there. And you don't want to see her portraits if that picture offends you, lol.
creaturesofwar 6:26PM (4/06/2008)
Oh man give him a break. He just giving a suggestion. Even if it's kind of out of the norm on the internet lol.
-Liberal from California (
Bill Coates 11:14AM (4/07/2008)
Hey Kansas,
Chicks and Cars you know!
If your an auto enthusiast you would know that. Ever been to an auto show or Nascar event. We are men and we dream about Chick and Cars! If you had to comment about her and not the car, then you are just one of those annoying bloggers that just wants to hear yourself talk. My appologies if you're a priest or something, or maybe a jealous woman?? Either way, please shhhh, because you might wreck it for the rest of us.
As for the car....NICE!! As for Jenna...NICE!!
John 11:14AM (4/07/2008)
Don't worry barrow jay at the scoffers here. These boys are frustrated because their parents caught them in their dirty little habit and now the internet is filtered in their home. The picture of Jenna on autoblog is as close as they can get to porn anymore.
Shaft 11:04AM (4/06/2008)
unifin - nice spam you dickweasel
Jenna - she's used to "pump your own" instead of a "full service" gas station
Reply
Dance Lady 11:18AM (4/06/2008)
If ppl buy her underwear on e-bay why shouldn't they buy her car :)
http://www.i-guide.ro
Reply
Mike 11:29AM (4/06/2008)
^^ Wonky comments system; that was supposed to be a reply to barrow.jay. Sorry for the double-post.