<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/03/nhtsa-cites-safety-concern-after-crash-testing-smart-fortwo/</link>
<description>Autoblog Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/03/nhtsa-cites-safety-concern-after-crash-testing-smart-fortwo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/03/nhtsa-cites-safety-concern-after-crash-testing-smart-fortwo/</guid><description><![CDATA[For as small as the car is i thought it did good in the crash test. My question is why would you by this car when for the same money you could by a Fit or a Yaris. For as small as the car is you would think it would cost less than $10,000 and get 55 to 65+ mpg. I don't get it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rar]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 3rd 2008 3:21PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>