http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/02/darpa-driverless-vehicles-to-race-at-grand-prix-of-long-beach/ Autoblog Comments for DARPA driverless vehicles to race at Grand Prix of Long Beach http://www.autoblog.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.autoblog.com en-us Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/02/darpa-driverless-vehicles-to-race-at-grand-prix-of-long-beach/http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/02/darpa-driverless-vehicles-to-race-at-grand-prix-of-long-beach/Apr 2nd 2008 12:04PMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/02/darpa-driverless-vehicles-to-race-at-grand-prix-of-long-beach/http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/02/darpa-driverless-vehicles-to-race-at-grand-prix-of-long-beach/Apr 2nd 2008 12:36PMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/02/darpa-driverless-vehicles-to-race-at-grand-prix-of-long-beach/http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/02/darpa-driverless-vehicles-to-race-at-grand-prix-of-long-beach/Apr 2nd 2008 12:50PMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/02/darpa-driverless-vehicles-to-race-at-grand-prix-of-long-beach/http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/02/darpa-driverless-vehicles-to-race-at-grand-prix-of-long-beach/
If people using the GPS system were willing to surrender their own judgement to drive their vehicles into areas that were not driveable, what change do these driverless vehicles have?]]>Apr 2nd 2008 1:09PMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/02/darpa-driverless-vehicles-to-race-at-grand-prix-of-long-beach/http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/02/darpa-driverless-vehicles-to-race-at-grand-prix-of-long-beach/Apr 2nd 2008 1:52PMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/02/darpa-driverless-vehicles-to-race-at-grand-prix-of-long-beach/http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/02/darpa-driverless-vehicles-to-race-at-grand-prix-of-long-beach/
There is an extraordinary pathetic fallacy in your response attempting to explain something by giving an explanation (which is fine) and then attacking the original post by saying it was irrelevant (which is not fine).

If it was irrelevant as you boldly claim, you wouldn't and shouldn't have bothered to respond. But since you responded, your post is just as irrelevant.

I still think driverless vehicles, wherever they are and whoever they are developed for, are a waste of resources. It's my opinion and dammit I'm entitled to it!

If it'll change, it'll only be because I want it to change. Because it's all about ME, not YOU.

With that said, I'm looking forward to the race. It'll be fun to see the outcome. Have nice day cheetoh-peetoh. Betcha didn't see THAT one coming 'eh? Heh heh heh.]]>Apr 3rd 2008 2:09AMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/02/darpa-driverless-vehicles-to-race-at-grand-prix-of-long-beach/http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/02/darpa-driverless-vehicles-to-race-at-grand-prix-of-long-beach/Apr 2nd 2008 1:49PMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/02/darpa-driverless-vehicles-to-race-at-grand-prix-of-long-beach/http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/02/darpa-driverless-vehicles-to-race-at-grand-prix-of-long-beach/
Champ Car is dead. These will be IRL cars. :'-(]]>Apr 2nd 2008 1:52PMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/02/darpa-driverless-vehicles-to-race-at-grand-prix-of-long-beach/http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/02/darpa-driverless-vehicles-to-race-at-grand-prix-of-long-beach/
The developers at Carnegie say that Boss is fully capable of running at 50mph, that is what I want to see.]]>Apr 2nd 2008 3:21PM