<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/01/report-audi-r8-to-get-twin-turbo-v10-power-next-year/</link>
<description>Autoblog Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/01/report-audi-r8-to-get-twin-turbo-v10-power-next-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/01/report-audi-r8-to-get-twin-turbo-v10-power-next-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ Brian:  Well, I beleive that's mostly the issue as well.  The Diesel is a V-12 though, not a V-10 as you stated.<br><br>The engine is large enough that the firewall had to be moved farther forward taking away cabin space.<br><br>We will likely see the 4.2L V-8 TDI in the R8 though instead.<br><br><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/20/did-we-say-50-50-audi-r8-v12-tdi-not-coming-4-2-v8-tdi-instea/" rel="nofollow">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/20/did-we-say-50-50-audi-r8-v12-tdi-not-coming-4-2-v8-tdi-instea/</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[montoym]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 1st 2008 8:10PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>