
Click above for high-res gallery from our First Drive of the Jaguar XF
The timing of our first hands-on experience with the Jaguar XF is, to say the least, awkward. Less than a week after Ford agreed to sell both Jaguar and Land Rover to India's Tata Motors, we find ourselves in sunny San Diego behind the wheel of Jag's supposed savior. While the business end of the equation will be exhaustively covered in the coming months, the renaissance underway at Tata's newly acquired pet is of equal importance. The XF is a serious step on the road to recovery, but undoing the perception gap that's plagued this cat for the last couple of decades won't be easy.
All photos © 2008 Damon Lavrinc / Weblogs, Inc.
click any image to enlarge

Among the myriad issues Jaguar has to overcome, the greatest is attracting young consumers into the fold. While the average age of a modern Jag buyer isn't nearly as high as a Buick's, it is still rare to see someone behind the wheel that isn't well on his or her way to collecting Social Security. Unfortunately, this kitty got neutered when it made the transition from concept to production. If there's anything that's going to draw new, youthful buyers to the brand, it's sinuous sheet metal that blends balance and bling. The XF just doesn't have it. The new Jag floats in an air of anonymity that may cause a few people to take notice, but it won't produce the neck trauma normally induced by Ian Callum's designs.


Viewed from afar, nothing seems to stand out. The beltline is high enough to convey the sedan's sporting intentions and the haunches that flow into the taillights are attractive enough -- in a watered-down, Aston Martin-sorta way. But you get the sense that the majority of the design took place a few inches from the clay, rather than taking in the vehicle as a whole. This approach, while doing little for the XF overall, has its benefits. The fluting that begins aft of the headlamps and flows into the hood is a nice touch, and the C-pillar is almost a dead-ringer for the XK. But as well-proportioned as everything is, nothing grabs your attention by the collars and screams at you like a drunken drill instructor on leave.
The interior is another issue entirely. The fit, finish and execution are totally unmatched in this highly competitive class and we can say with impunity that nothing short of a Roller or a Bentley comes close to the design and materials inside the XF. The top of the dashboard benefits from a double dose of stitching that flows from door to door, while underneath an aluminum belt encompasses occupants and blends some 21st century styling with the old-world feel of acres of wood. Chris Braeendale, one of Jaguar's marketing crew, says there's more wood in the XF than in the 1962 Mk. II, and we believe him. But its execution doesn't suffocate inhabitants like the XJ and its predecessors.

While our assessment of the exterior confirms Callum's creed that more designers were tasked to work on the interior than the metal surrounding it, it is obvious that OCD-levels of focus were paid to how the driver and passenger interact with the electronics. The very large central-mounted touch screen is standard equipment on all XFs, and controls everything from the satellite navigation to the stereo. An iPod connector integrates directly into the system and allows navigation through playlists, artists, albums and more, while a USB input and a standard auxiliary jack can be used for other portable media devices. We even took a moment to hook up our iPhone to the system, play a few tracks from The Bravery and make a quick call from our contacts list through the Bluetooth connection – all of which worked seamlessly. Jaguar's interior boffins were also smart enough to place a volume control knob, track selection and audio source buttons into the console below to avoid iDrive-levels of frustration, along with redundant stereo controls mounted on the steering wheel.

It's unfortunate that the simple, elegant execution of the electronics is playing second fiddle to the pseudo-dramatic JaguarDrive starting sequence. Depress the brake, push the pulsating start/stop button at the top of the center console, and the rotary gear selector rises into the palm of your hand while the air vents slowly spin into place. From there, you can select from your normal assortment of gears (P, R, N and D), and with a slight press down and a twist to the right, you're in Sport mode. The whole process is impressive the first, second and third time, but after a while it is just another routine that will likely lose its allure after you've show it to the neighbors. What's more impressive is the JaguarSense system. Rather than grabbing a handle to open the glove box or pushing a button to turn on the map lamps, a proximity sensor allows you to glide your finger overtop the light (or the circular sensor mounted on the dash for the glove box). The system worked flawlessly with the overhead lights, but the glove box control needed a more deliberate action due to the sensor's programming to avoid unnecessary openings. Here's hoping that it works as intended when a boy in blue is waiting for your insurance and registration.


Our only gripes with the interior were the sharp edges underneath the steering wheel's aluminum trim and the JaguarDrive's somewhat shifty feel. This might be an issue with the production models we were given for our road test, but both the transmission selector and the rotary knobs for the stereo and climate control felt like they needed a bit more refinement before they were ready for primetime placement.
Once properly positioned in the driver's seat, it's obvious that Jag is taking serious aim at the sports sedan segment. The seats are nicely bolstered without inhibiting movement and when coupled with the high center console that bisects the front seats, there's a serious sense of focus that's been missing from Jags for far too long.

We opted to start our drive with the naturally aspirated XF, which produces 300 hp and 310 lb.-ft. of torque from ye-old 4.2-liter, V8 mill. With the futuristic gear selector in Drive, we made our way out of the confines of central San Diego and onto the nearest freeway, bound for the rolling hills that separate civilization from the deserts that surround the area.
Cruising along at 75 mph on the highway, the XF proves that Jaguar has done its best to strike a balance between handling and comfort. The suspension's compliance over bumps and breaks is perfectly suited for long-distance cruising, but not at the expense of road-feel. The steering's on-center tactility is only matched by its crisp turn-in and balanced weighting, and while it's a little over-boosted around town, turning at speed is inspiring and instantaneous; we just wish the diameter of the wheel was about an inch shorter.


After our brief jaunt on the motorway, we found ourselves on the most gloriously twisting tarmac this side of Highway 1. Here, the XF truly came into its own. With the gear selector set to sport and the traction control in TracDSC (allowing for minimal amounts of wheel slip), the Jag consumed the road in quick order. The six-speed ZF automatic transmission reacts swiftly to hard acceleration inputs with shifts that are 15-percent quicker than those in the XK. However, the paddle shifters were what truly impressed. With a light pull back on the lever, the tranny drops down a gear, simultaneously blipping the throttle and providing a seamless transition as we brake before the corner. Turn-in, start feeding in the throttle and the lack of an aural assault is countered by the healthy amount of thrust propelling us through the bend. By the time we've reached 6,000 rpm, the transmission's computers are ready to deliver the next gear as we hustle along to the next turn. After a handful of bends, we're convinced that the XF is one of the best handling sedans for the money. But what about that Frost Blue model with the "Supercharged" badges?

You can spec the "Luxury" and "Premium Luxury" XF with many of the interior amenities of the maxed-out supercharged version, including the Bowers and Wilkins, 440-watt, 14-speaker audio setup, which, for the record, is pure ear-porn. But you can't get Jaguar's Computer Active Technology Suspension (CATS) or the Dynamic Mode that integrates with the electronically controlled, two-stage adaptive dampers without making the leap to the forced-induction model. The Dynamic Mode fully exploits the XF's unflappable chassis and allows you to run the blown, 4.2-liter V8 up into its rev-limited 6,500-rpm peak.

Caning the supercharged version through the bends with the checkered-flag button depressed, you can feel the rear suspension firming up as weight transfers to the front under braking. Through the turns, it is obvious that the adaptive suspension is working its magic, but it's more intuitive than intrusive. With 420 hp and 414 lb.-ft. of torque being shuffled between the rear wheels, the XF has no trouble getting out if its own way, but the deft touch and communicative steering seems somewhat lost compared to its naturally-aspirated sibling. While the immediate thrust and slightly more aggressive exhaust note is endearing, the 200-pound weight penalty caused a bout of regret that we wouldn't be spending more time behind the wheel of the standard model.

Sales of the XF began last month and with 4,000 preorders, Jag's new keeper may already have a hit on its hands. Pricing is aggressive for the segment, with the Luxury model coming in at $49,975, the Premium Luxury variant set at $55,975, and the supercharged version carrying a sticker of $62,975. For those of you who can't wait for the XF-R due out sometime next year, it's simply a matter of choosing which features you value most, and being content with the knowledge that whatever version you choose, you'll be able to enjoy the most engaging vehicle ever produced by Jaguar while helping to reestablish the storied marque as a forward-thinking purveyor of one of the world's finest sedans.
All photos © 2008 Damon Lavrinc / Weblogs, Inc.
Our travel and lodging for this media event was provided by the manufacturer.













Reader Comments (Page 1 of 4)
Sam @ Apr 1st 2008 8:13PM
i think its wrong for you to say the styling is anything less than spectacular. Your choice of red for the naturally aspirated version wasn't the best too. I just hope this thing can do good powerslides.
Frick @ Apr 1st 2008 8:49PM
for it to look spectacular it would have to look like this;
http://www.autoblog.com/photos/jaguar-c-xf-concept/127053/full/
vintage @ Apr 2nd 2008 1:57AM
Frick: Spot on. I hate this stupid XF. The concept was what should have been built, but instead they built this abortion. It doesn't look ANYTHING like the concept, almost none of the lines are the same. Jaguar can start making tuk tuks for all I care.
Johnny @ Apr 1st 2008 8:18PM
Sounds like your dog just got neutered for no reason! the XF is a beautiful car! any more panache and the car would overstate itself! Jaguars are about 1 thing, subtle elegance, this sir is a perfect execution of that once great design trend
tuna @ Apr 1st 2008 9:33PM
There is nothing elegant about the production car's execution. I honestly don't see what the big fuss is about. Styling is a little more daring than the Jaguar we're all familiar with, but compared to the rest of the field it's nothing to write home about. Looks like this cat aged some and lost some snarl between concept and production. It has a distinctive Ford stink to it now.
Blaine @ Apr 2nd 2008 11:57AM
"Subtle elegance"? This looks like a Hyundai. Subtle enough for you?
speedball3 @ Apr 1st 2008 8:29PM
The car seems handsome in pics... I'm sorry to hear that it's not quite as handsome in real life. Though I can see how the rear end can be a bit dull (the tail lights kind of reminds me of a saab). I wonder what mountain roads you guys drive... I'd like to check them out. =)
DJ @ Apr 1st 2008 8:39PM
"The car seems handsome in pics... I'm sorry to hear that it's not quite as handsome in real life"
It's the complete and total OPPOSITE! This is car that is so much BETTER looking in person than in photos. Photos give almost no perspective of just how low and wide this car really is. And from the rear, there's a ton of Aston back there. With a different nose, this could be a baby Rapide.
DJ @ Apr 1st 2008 8:39PM
I had the opportunity to spend roughly 45 minutes driving a Premium Luxury XF on an extended test drive last Saturday. I have to concur with alomst everything above, except I didn't find the JaguarDrive shifty or cheesy in any way. And I never got tired of watching the vents open and close.
Most of the driving was on streets resembling those in certain third world countries, but this is Milwaukee and winter has just destroyed any smooth pavement we may have had. That said, the XF handled the rough and rutted streets unlike any other car I have ever driven. Vastly superior to my wife's XJ8. As far as handling, while not BMW 5-Series sharp, it was vastly superior to anything Lexus, Infiniti, MB or AUdi offer right now in this class. Probably the one thing I liked the most were the seats. Jag has always excelled in wrapping the driver like hand tailored Saville Row or Italian suit and the XF is no exception! Just perfect fitting seats! In addition, the Midnight metallic paint is dazzling.
If there is anything I didn't like, it was the wheels. They just look cheaper than the car itself. Of course you could always order one of the gorgeous sets of wheels from an XK and swap them out. I'd love to see one of the five spoke sets on this car!
zamafir @ Apr 1st 2008 9:01PM
Yeah, aping the standard 18" wheels (Hufs) on the GTI doesn't suite a car this size.
zamafir @ Apr 1st 2008 9:00PM
x2, I absolutely abhorred the car until I stumbled into it a few months ago, there's a lot going on that doesn't translate well in photography (as has been reported countless times in the press). It looks very very good in person. Not a car I'd own, but quite good none the less.
rav3 @ Apr 1st 2008 8:46PM
Looks like a very nice Infinity morphing into a Jag or something. I like the 5-spoke wheels. The interior is quite interesting but doesn't look too Jag-like. But I guess this is new Jag material.
I like Jags but this isn't my favorite. From the side its beautiful yet derivative. I'm seeing Nissan/Infiniti. From the rear: Jag meets Aston-Martin.
That blue one is very nice. Good price, too!
mk @ Apr 1st 2008 8:48PM
Not perfect.
The headlights are gharish, compared to the concept's elegant and sinister versions. They could have been production-ized with a downturned corner, instead of a softly-giddy upturned corner, and permanently surprised low-beam eyebrow line.
Other than that, I tend to like it. Too bad they don't offer the sport tuned active suspension with a naturally aspirated V8, as well as with the Supercharged version.
RT @ Apr 1st 2008 9:15PM
I disagree with your assessment of the XF's exterior styling. I finally saw one in person today, and think it's the best looking sedan on the market, bar none. All of the lines flow naturally, and the shape makes a wonderful cohesive piece of mass-market sculpture. I think the owner of the XF I saw was getting annoyed, since I was practically circling his car for a couple minutes while he was pumping gas al- that's how taken I am with the new cat.
Xcountryflyer @ Apr 1st 2008 9:17PM
It is very rare that a production car ends up looking 100% identical to the show car. I think the XF is still a very attractive car and it sounds like the interior is stellar and driving dynamics are very good. I totally disagree with the reviewers styling opinion, although red is not the most flattering color for it.
It looks to be a success and it deserves to be a success so it can lead Jaguar out of the doldrums. Kudos.
Too bad for Ford--dumping money into it and selling it as it seems to be turning around.
CarbonBlack @ Apr 1st 2008 9:24PM
so this is the surprise "first drive" you guys referenced in the podcast.
That is one gorgeous car!
42 @ Apr 1st 2008 9:34PM
pretty, but it's still a Jag.
check back in a coupla years to see if they can make a car that doesn't fall to bits.
DJ @ Apr 1st 2008 10:10PM
As the owner of 2004 XJ8 with nearly 50,000 niles on it, your misguided comment couldn't be farther from the truth.
So far, this car has had one problem, a transmission cooling line gasket that started to leak. Problem was fixed quickly and completely.
When judging Jag's reliability, people need to stop paying attention to the absolute BULLSH*T put out by Consumer's Reports. I honestly don't believe they tested a Jag for reliability since the late 60's. Why else would Jag be nipping a the heels of Lexus in the JD Power surveys? You would be hard pressed to find the owner of a Jag built since 2004 that has had serious problems with their cars. The one thing Ford did right was to vastly improve overall quality.
ckm @ Apr 1st 2008 11:13PM
I agree with DJ. I have a 10 year old XJR and it's perfect. I put around 20k miles a year on it and it's been dead reliable. I've spent more money fixing a door that was key'd than on regular maintenance.
The thing about these cars is that you HAVE to do the scheduled maintenance. I think Jags get a bad rap because people don't maintain them...
PJ @ Apr 2nd 2008 9:49AM
Just to clarify, CR doesn't "test" vehicles for reliability; their reliability data is compiled from thousands of owner responses.
They currently do not rate any Jaguar for reliability, presumably because the sample group hasn't been big enough of late.
Though I have nothing against Jag, JD Power's Initial Quality findings should be taken with a very large grain of salt. Though the title suggests that its findings reflect a vehicle's reliability, over half of the test's criteria address superficial design issues like: "features [that] are difficult to use or understand," "problems with front- or rear-end styling," and "the sound of the doors when closing."