<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog - Comments for Carmakers reducing options, saving money</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/31/carmakers-reducing-options-saving-money/</link>
<description>Autoblog Comments for Carmakers reducing options, saving money</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Carmakers reducing options, saving money]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/31/carmakers-reducing-options-saving-money/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/31/carmakers-reducing-options-saving-money/</guid><description><![CDATA[In other words, if I want option "a", I'll be forced to buy options "b", "c" and "d" whether or not I want them.  Wonderful.....<br><br>Just like the Peugeot I had years ago that, if I had wanted power windows (power door locks were standard), I had to also get cruise control, a sunroof, alloy rims and a whole bunch of other stuff I did not want...)<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[spots]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2008 6:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Carmakers reducing options, saving money]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/31/carmakers-reducing-options-saving-money/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/31/carmakers-reducing-options-saving-money/</guid><description><![CDATA[That's exactly correct.<br>Wait for the automakers to tell us it's going to best for everyone.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SPG]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2008 7:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Carmakers reducing options, saving money]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/31/carmakers-reducing-options-saving-money/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/31/carmakers-reducing-options-saving-money/</guid><description><![CDATA[Didn't Ford already announce they were reducing the number of option in order to help their customers?  Yeeaaahhhhh, we're doing it all for you, yeeaaahhhhh...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Disgruntled Goat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2008 10:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Carmakers reducing options, saving money]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/31/carmakers-reducing-options-saving-money/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/31/carmakers-reducing-options-saving-money/</guid><description><![CDATA[Honda, Mazda, Toyota and VW are pretty good at limiting option lists. They pretty much option by trim level and throw things in when you move up the pricing structure and leaving bigger ticket items like NAV or super luxury packages as optional. It totally makes sense from a model combination standpoint.<br><br>It is always confusing when the option list is 2 pages long and some packages are available or not available depending on area or what options you've already chosen. Very complicated.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Xcountryflyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2008 6:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Carmakers reducing options, saving money]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/31/carmakers-reducing-options-saving-money/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/31/carmakers-reducing-options-saving-money/</guid><description><![CDATA[It really is not that complex- you check the boxes for the stuff you want; don't check the boxes for stuff you don't want- then you check to see if it's all compatible.  A 12 year old can figure it all out.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[spots]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2008 7:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Carmakers reducing options, saving money]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/31/carmakers-reducing-options-saving-money/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/31/carmakers-reducing-options-saving-money/</guid><description><![CDATA[Right, spots. Because configuring a car on a website is the same as walking into a dealer and finding exactly what you want. Good luck with that.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Seoultrain]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2008 9:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Carmakers reducing options, saving money]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/31/carmakers-reducing-options-saving-money/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/31/carmakers-reducing-options-saving-money/</guid><description><![CDATA[As a consumer, choices make me unhappy.<br><br>...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dustin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2008 6:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Carmakers reducing options, saving money]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/31/carmakers-reducing-options-saving-money/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/31/carmakers-reducing-options-saving-money/</guid><description><![CDATA[There are good and bad ways to do this.  The good way is how Hyundai does it... lots of standard equipment that varies a bit by trim level, and a few options.  <br><br>The bad way is how VW and Infiniti have done it, keeping popular items optional and requiring unrelated packages to get them.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DKB_SATX]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2008 6:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Carmakers reducing options, saving money]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/31/carmakers-reducing-options-saving-money/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/31/carmakers-reducing-options-saving-money/</guid><description><![CDATA[A few years back, we were shopping for a small car, and were looking between a Corolla, a Civic, and a Focus.  We ended up getting the Focus, largely because of the driving dynamics, but also because we could get EXACTLY the options we wanted, without anything else to inflate the price.  We could get a moonroof, side airbags, cruise, tilt/telescoping wheel, ABS, and the color we wanted without having to pony up for a spoiler, alloy wheels, extra plastic cladding, or anything else non-functional.<br><br>Toyota was out because their "base price" didn't include the mandatory options package, the cheapest of which was over $700.  The packages with some equipment that we wanted were over $1200.  The Civic didn't offer a moonroof without going up to the highest trim ($$$$$$!).  <br><br>I hope Ford doesn't overdo it and end up like Toyota.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nardvark]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2008 7:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Carmakers reducing options, saving money]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/31/carmakers-reducing-options-saving-money/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/31/carmakers-reducing-options-saving-money/</guid><description><![CDATA[I like it when automakers do this because I look for used cars with very specific features, like the sport handling package.  It's easy to find what you want when it came standard with a trim level, since sellers know about that and it's usually written on the car (or otherwise obvious).<br><br>It's a lot harder when it's an "obscure" option that the seller probably has no idea about, and may not be visible on the outside of the car.  So I vote for fewer options.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2008 7:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Carmakers reducing options, saving money]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/31/carmakers-reducing-options-saving-money/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/31/carmakers-reducing-options-saving-money/</guid><description><![CDATA[I hate having to buy large option packages. I want a bare-bones car.  I don't care about a stereo, because an aftermarket unit will be put in. Same with the wheels and tires. Heck, even the suspension will probably be upgraded. Electronic locks and windows would be nice. Same with air conditioning, but I don't want heated seats, electronic nannies, 2 dozen warning lights, "premium" anything, fancy embroidery, spoilers, mood lighting, sat nav, or any other of the dozens of costly and weighty options that detract from the essence of what an automobile should be. Just give me a couple displacement options, one with forced-induction, and a diesel option. And please, don't force me to use an automatic transmission. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jurm]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2008 7:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Carmakers reducing options, saving money]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/31/carmakers-reducing-options-saving-money/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/31/carmakers-reducing-options-saving-money/</guid><description><![CDATA[Did you know you can't even buy a basic Chevy Silverado without an automatic tranny anymore?  That's just wrong on so many levels....  I hate automatics and will not buy one in a new vehicle, period.  Used?  Yeah, I've bought automatics before, grudgingly, if the rest of the vehicle was "right".]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[spots]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2008 7:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Carmakers reducing options, saving money]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/31/carmakers-reducing-options-saving-money/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/31/carmakers-reducing-options-saving-money/</guid><description><![CDATA[Honda is the model of simplicity when it comes to options... basically pick an LX or EX, Add Leather and/or a V6 if you want, then decide if you'll take the navi plunge... that's about it. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[D.S.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2008 8:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Carmakers reducing options, saving money]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/31/carmakers-reducing-options-saving-money/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/31/carmakers-reducing-options-saving-money/</guid><description><![CDATA[And you're probably SOL on a Honda if you want a sunroof but don't want leather seats or an automatic...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[spots]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2008 9:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Carmakers reducing options, saving money]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/31/carmakers-reducing-options-saving-money/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/31/carmakers-reducing-options-saving-money/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ah, hmm, never heard of the EX I guess? The leather is only on the EX-L. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 1st 2008 9:15AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Carmakers reducing options, saving money]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/31/carmakers-reducing-options-saving-money/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/31/carmakers-reducing-options-saving-money/</guid><description><![CDATA[my suggestion to this is to let manufacturers have their way with dealers in terms of putting packages on the floor but let the picky consumer have their choice on the web and put their car together as they choose. <br>id like to think that those of us on this site have better knowledge on what we need in a car. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[almost Dr. G..]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2008 9:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Carmakers reducing options, saving money]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/31/carmakers-reducing-options-saving-money/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/31/carmakers-reducing-options-saving-money/</guid><description><![CDATA[In Europe dealers keep very little stock and most order their car exactly like they want it.  The increased cost is not in the manufacture but in the carry expense of having strangely equipped cars in inventory ordered by reneging customers or deranged dealers.  I can understand limiting choices for dealer stock but for a "sold" order why doesn't Ford grasp a competitive edge by allowing a custom Focus?  When you want to differentiate your product why not seize on your manufacturing flexibility?  This approach probably has the least impact on inexpensive cars but could have a big impact on the luxury models.  The luxury imports would have trouble responding the the cache of a custom Cadillac (Lincoln doesn't still make cars does it?).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ccweems]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2008 9:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Carmakers reducing options, saving money]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/31/carmakers-reducing-options-saving-money/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/31/carmakers-reducing-options-saving-money/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is good from a cost perspective, both for the manufacturer, the dealer, and to you.  For the manufacturer, they can order larger quantities of pricier products like NAV systems and thus get a better discount.  The dealers profit because they can make more sales since they're more likely to have the car you want, and you profit (if you choose to see it that way) by taking advantage of reduced pricing on option packages vs. individual pricing.  Yeah, it can be kind of hard if you only want a specific feature and it's in a $2000 package, but that, methinks, is rather more the exception than the rule.  Also, you don't have to drive around all day to different dealers looking for the Focus with color 4, and options A, B, D, F, Y, U, I, L, K, but not H, T, or R.<br><br>Custom-ordering a car is a way around this, but most dealers want you to buy what's on the lot and won't haggle much on a car ordered from the factory with specifically the options you want.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Buckus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2008 9:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Carmakers reducing options, saving money]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/31/carmakers-reducing-options-saving-money/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/31/carmakers-reducing-options-saving-money/</guid><description><![CDATA[10,000 option combinations on a Focus and I still can't buy a new one with a turbo, all-wheel-drive, and/or a performance suspension?<br><br><br><br>C'mon, Ford. <br><br>(And yes, this is the weekly "bash Ford 'cause they don't bring their Euro cars over here" post.)<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cornholio]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2008 9:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Carmakers reducing options, saving money]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/31/carmakers-reducing-options-saving-money/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/31/carmakers-reducing-options-saving-money/</guid><description><![CDATA[MINI does it the best, you can pick almost whatever you want on the car...however this makes it really expensive. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2008 10:32PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>