Add your comments
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments.
New KITT Attack Mode revealed at Comic Con
London 2008: Honda OSM concept roadster says, "Cheerio!"
London 2008: Lotus unveils the Evora
2010 Chevy Camaro - Official Details and Images
2010 Chevy Camaro - LIVE from the reveal
First Drive: Maserati Quattroporte S in Europe
First Drive: 2008 MINI Cooper S JCW
In the Autoblog Garage:2009 Nissan GT-R
North American Exclusive First Drive: Alfa MiTo
First Drive: 2009 Kia Borrego
Reader Comments for
Subscribe to this thread(Page 1 of 1)
ltclloyd @ Mar 30th 2008 8:01PM
sorry I don't understand.. I spend less for less, or more for more. right now on petrol I get about 25mpg I don't find enough E85 to maximize tuning, yet... but just extending Injector pulse width I get about 20% less MPG (or about 20 MPG) but pay 20% less then regular in cost. My only advantage isusually my car needs 91 or better octane which here is actually a whole dollar more then E85 so there is a small net cost benefit. but hey as someone that's driven thousands of miles on the stuff and done the math. and my own experments. I guess I should have not wasted all that time actually learning the truth and just spouted out anti ethanol rhetoric, Silly me.
there is value, just make it more availble.. and cheaper PLEASE!