<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog - Comments for Motor Trend claims Nissan GT-R making at least 507 HP</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/29/motor-trend-claims-nissan-gt-r-making-at-least-507-hp/</link>
<description>Autoblog Comments for Motor Trend claims Nissan GT-R making at least 507 HP</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motor Trend claims Nissan GT-R making at least 507 HP]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/29/motor-trend-claims-nissan-gt-r-making-at-least-507-hp/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/29/motor-trend-claims-nissan-gt-r-making-at-least-507-hp/</guid><description><![CDATA[had no idea it weighed 4000 lbs? leaves the door open for nissan to make a supperleggera just in time for the introduction of the next 911turbo]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DomManganelli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 29th 2008 9:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motor Trend claims Nissan GT-R making at least 507 HP]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/29/motor-trend-claims-nissan-gt-r-making-at-least-507-hp/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/29/motor-trend-claims-nissan-gt-r-making-at-least-507-hp/</guid><description><![CDATA[V-Spec will be lighter with more HP.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[zreeb]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 29th 2008 11:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motor Trend claims Nissan GT-R making at least 507 HP]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/29/motor-trend-claims-nissan-gt-r-making-at-least-507-hp/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/29/motor-trend-claims-nissan-gt-r-making-at-least-507-hp/</guid><description><![CDATA[The V-spec model hasn't had more HP than the street model in the past, has it?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[why not the LS2LS7?]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 29th 2008 12:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motor Trend claims Nissan GT-R making at least 507 HP]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/29/motor-trend-claims-nissan-gt-r-making-at-least-507-hp/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/29/motor-trend-claims-nissan-gt-r-making-at-least-507-hp/</guid><description><![CDATA[The V-Spec never had more power on paper, but the R34 never had more power than the R32 on paper either. They were always conservatively rated at 280-ish hp. If I had to guess, I'd say it probably did. Maybe resident Skyline expert Sean Morris can shed some light on the subject. Where are you Sean?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Franz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 29th 2008 1:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motor Trend claims Nissan GT-R making at least 507 HP]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/29/motor-trend-claims-nissan-gt-r-making-at-least-507-hp/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/29/motor-trend-claims-nissan-gt-r-making-at-least-507-hp/</guid><description><![CDATA[They were all officially rated at 280hp for legal reasons, regardless of how much power they actually made.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jgp]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 29th 2008 6:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motor Trend claims Nissan GT-R making at least 507 HP]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/29/motor-trend-claims-nissan-gt-r-making-at-least-507-hp/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/29/motor-trend-claims-nissan-gt-r-making-at-least-507-hp/</guid><description><![CDATA[Not legal reasons. It was basically a gentleman's agreement.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Franz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 29th 2008 7:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motor Trend claims Nissan GT-R making at least 507 HP]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/29/motor-trend-claims-nissan-gt-r-making-at-least-507-hp/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/29/motor-trend-claims-nissan-gt-r-making-at-least-507-hp/</guid><description><![CDATA[if i'm not mistaken the gentlemen's agreement was to avoid any kind of legal restrictions and lawsuits that would come with high output engines. avoiding a horsepower war, now that is true business ethics.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DomManganelli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 29th 2008 11:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motor Trend claims Nissan GT-R making at least 507 HP]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/29/motor-trend-claims-nissan-gt-r-making-at-least-507-hp/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/29/motor-trend-claims-nissan-gt-r-making-at-least-507-hp/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wowee Wow Wow!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[3seriesisking]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 29th 2008 9:55AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motor Trend claims Nissan GT-R making at least 507 HP]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/29/motor-trend-claims-nissan-gt-r-making-at-least-507-hp/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/29/motor-trend-claims-nissan-gt-r-making-at-least-507-hp/</guid><description><![CDATA[Strip it down and become UNSTOPPABLE!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mcheddadi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 29th 2008 10:00AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motor Trend claims Nissan GT-R making at least 507 HP]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/29/motor-trend-claims-nissan-gt-r-making-at-least-507-hp/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/29/motor-trend-claims-nissan-gt-r-making-at-least-507-hp/</guid><description><![CDATA[Eh I'd bet it needs alot of that weight to keep the performance. You might be able to take off a few hundred pounds, but nothing more than that.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 29th 2008 10:01AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motor Trend claims Nissan GT-R making at least 507 HP]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/29/motor-trend-claims-nissan-gt-r-making-at-least-507-hp/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/29/motor-trend-claims-nissan-gt-r-making-at-least-507-hp/</guid><description><![CDATA[Typically the power-loss numbers for a front-engine/rear-drive car are more on the order of 25 percent, especially if it's awd even with a 100-percent rear torque split.  15 percent would be correct for a car with engine, transmission and drive wheels co-located, like a 911.  But dyno numbers fluctuate anyway, from day to day, operator to operator, phase of the moon to phase of the moon...<br><br>Stephan Wilkinson]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephan Wilkinson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 29th 2008 10:00AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motor Trend claims Nissan GT-R making at least 507 HP]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/29/motor-trend-claims-nissan-gt-r-making-at-least-507-hp/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/29/motor-trend-claims-nissan-gt-r-making-at-least-507-hp/</guid><description><![CDATA[I agree that 15% drivetrain loss sounds low for an AWD car.  I've heard that some AWD systems sap closer to 30% of the power available at the flywheel.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 29th 2008 10:09AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motor Trend claims Nissan GT-R making at least 507 HP]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/29/motor-trend-claims-nissan-gt-r-making-at-least-507-hp/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/29/motor-trend-claims-nissan-gt-r-making-at-least-507-hp/</guid><description><![CDATA[I heartily disagree with your 25% figure on drivetrain loss on a dyno. Especially for a front engine, rear drive car. Dyno runs are done in top gear and with a rather heavy load to keep the rate of acceleration down and thus lower the inertial losses as much as possible.<br><br>That figure is more likely for an AWD car, although I doubt this one was functioning as an AWD car when on the dyno.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[why not the LS2LS7?]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 29th 2008 12:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motor Trend claims Nissan GT-R making at least 507 HP]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/29/motor-trend-claims-nissan-gt-r-making-at-least-507-hp/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/29/motor-trend-claims-nissan-gt-r-making-at-least-507-hp/</guid><description><![CDATA[The losses aren't all inertial.  Lot of frictional losses as well.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephan Wilkinson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 29th 2008 12:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motor Trend claims Nissan GT-R making at least 507 HP]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/29/motor-trend-claims-nissan-gt-r-making-at-least-507-hp/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/29/motor-trend-claims-nissan-gt-r-making-at-least-507-hp/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ why not the LS2/LS7?:<br>It was functioning as an AWD car on the dyno. On an AWD Dynojet, the rollers aren't mechanically linked and unless I'm seeing things, the front wheels were turning.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Franz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 29th 2008 3:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motor Trend claims Nissan GT-R making at least 507 HP]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/29/motor-trend-claims-nissan-gt-r-making-at-least-507-hp/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/29/motor-trend-claims-nissan-gt-r-making-at-least-507-hp/</guid><description><![CDATA[That still doesn't explain it.  The power to weight ration is still way off being able to do what it does]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[HotRodzNKustoms]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 29th 2008 10:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motor Trend claims Nissan GT-R making at least 507 HP]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/29/motor-trend-claims-nissan-gt-r-making-at-least-507-hp/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/29/motor-trend-claims-nissan-gt-r-making-at-least-507-hp/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have a feeling that many high-power road cars like the Z06 are not limited by their power-to-weight ratio, they are limited by grip.  If the GT-R is losing less power to wheel spin or it is delivering power more smoothly, it would explain better lap times despite its weight.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 29th 2008 10:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motor Trend claims Nissan GT-R making at least 507 HP]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/29/motor-trend-claims-nissan-gt-r-making-at-least-507-hp/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/29/motor-trend-claims-nissan-gt-r-making-at-least-507-hp/</guid><description><![CDATA[That's what I immediately thought as well.  The AWD system has a lot to do with the incredible performance.  A base WRX has pretty impressive acceleration and cornering ability, even though it weighs about 3400 pounds.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[vwboyaf1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 29th 2008 10:42AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motor Trend claims Nissan GT-R making at least 507 HP]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/29/motor-trend-claims-nissan-gt-r-making-at-least-507-hp/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/29/motor-trend-claims-nissan-gt-r-making-at-least-507-hp/</guid><description><![CDATA[The 911 is awd also, people. And 30 hp at the crank still doesn't explain 3.3 s against 3.7 s to sixty. <br><br>The gearing on the GTR is supposedly very tight through thirdgear, probably a factor. No one complains because there's no clutch. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[James Sonne]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 29th 2008 11:50AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motor Trend claims Nissan GT-R making at least 507 HP]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/29/motor-trend-claims-nissan-gt-r-making-at-least-507-hp/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/29/motor-trend-claims-nissan-gt-r-making-at-least-507-hp/</guid><description><![CDATA[I saw this car yesterday at the NY auto show.  I hate to say it, but it's a good looking car, pictures don't do it justice. (and i am one of the haters)<br><br>Also MT ran the car in the 1/4 mile, 11.5@124 is very fast, although conditions were more than favorable to an awd turbo car, 52 degrees out.  I think that number will change drastically when people run it at 85+degrees.<br>Cool air and traction that is not affected by the same cold air that makes it fast, is quite the recipe.<br><br>This car seems to be the real deal, and may not be overhyped.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jcar302]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 29th 2008 11:01AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>