<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog - Comments for I'm sorry, Dave - more autonomy in the name of safety?</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/28/im-sorry-dave-more-autonomy-in-the-name-of-safety/</link>
<description>Autoblog Comments for I'm sorry, Dave - more autonomy in the name of safety?</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on I'm sorry, Dave - more autonomy in the name of safety?]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/28/im-sorry-dave-more-autonomy-in-the-name-of-safety/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/28/im-sorry-dave-more-autonomy-in-the-name-of-safety/</guid><description><![CDATA[Systems like this will be great for everyone else to use.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[James T]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 28th 2008 8:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on I'm sorry, Dave - more autonomy in the name of safety?]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/28/im-sorry-dave-more-autonomy-in-the-name-of-safety/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/28/im-sorry-dave-more-autonomy-in-the-name-of-safety/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm all for it. As long as it comes with an off switch.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ethan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 28th 2008 9:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on I'm sorry, Dave - more autonomy in the name of safety?]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/28/im-sorry-dave-more-autonomy-in-the-name-of-safety/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/28/im-sorry-dave-more-autonomy-in-the-name-of-safety/</guid><description><![CDATA[Personally the only electrical systems I really want are electric start, ignition, and maybe headlight/taillights. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[easyrider425]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 28th 2008 9:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on I'm sorry, Dave - more autonomy in the name of safety?]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/28/im-sorry-dave-more-autonomy-in-the-name-of-safety/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/28/im-sorry-dave-more-autonomy-in-the-name-of-safety/</guid><description><![CDATA[So, standard candle-light head and tail lights, but optional electric?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Shadyman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 29th 2008 12:15AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on I'm sorry, Dave - more autonomy in the name of safety?]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/28/im-sorry-dave-more-autonomy-in-the-name-of-safety/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/28/im-sorry-dave-more-autonomy-in-the-name-of-safety/</guid><description><![CDATA[I like electronic tachs and fuel gauges as well.  <br><br>What do you do for cabin ventilation?  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Derek]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 29th 2008 12:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on I'm sorry, Dave - more autonomy in the name of safety?]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/28/im-sorry-dave-more-autonomy-in-the-name-of-safety/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/28/im-sorry-dave-more-autonomy-in-the-name-of-safety/</guid><description><![CDATA[On August 29th, 1997 CarNET became sentient ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[cowbell]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 28th 2008 9:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on I'm sorry, Dave - more autonomy in the name of safety?]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/28/im-sorry-dave-more-autonomy-in-the-name-of-safety/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/28/im-sorry-dave-more-autonomy-in-the-name-of-safety/</guid><description><![CDATA[easyrider425, I agree!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[LoneWolf]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 28th 2008 10:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on I'm sorry, Dave - more autonomy in the name of safety?]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/28/im-sorry-dave-more-autonomy-in-the-name-of-safety/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/28/im-sorry-dave-more-autonomy-in-the-name-of-safety/</guid><description><![CDATA["This would effectively enable the car to steer you out of trouble if it compares your trajectory with the nav system and determines you're off-course."<br><br>Or it steers you down the wrong course.  <br><br>Great, anything that will let drivers pay LESS attention to the road...  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Derek]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 29th 2008 12:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on I'm sorry, Dave - more autonomy in the name of safety?]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/28/im-sorry-dave-more-autonomy-in-the-name-of-safety/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/28/im-sorry-dave-more-autonomy-in-the-name-of-safety/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah, and GIS/GPS systems are never wrong, and are so great at improvisation when something unexpected happens.<br><br>I am in the technology tools business, but I am not on board with this.<br><br>I am all for technology that knows and does not question it's master, namely ME.<br><br>The minute it has divided loyalties, or supercedes my control, I am done with it.<br><br>No black boxes that record data for insurance lawyers. No On-Star that interfaces the on-board systems and has a cellphone without any reporting interface. (without activating the speakers for hands-free calling, you have NO IDEA what that phone is transmitting to whom.) <br><br>I don't even want an integrated phone, integrated GPS, or anything else permanently built in. It only gets obsolete without being replaceable, and I want to choose what phone and/or GPS unit that I use, based on it's merits.<br><br>Automation, no thanks. If cars get automated, I go classic. hell, I'll go air-cooled and pre-electronic. A 60's Porsche 911 sounds good, or a classic Jag sedan for a bigger car. Nice and low-tech.<br><br>I do have the Hal9000 eye as the wallpaper on my iPhone, but it has yet to tell me "No", or sing "Daisy" to me. That might be a neat trick, though.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 29th 2008 1:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on I'm sorry, Dave - more autonomy in the name of safety?]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/28/im-sorry-dave-more-autonomy-in-the-name-of-safety/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/28/im-sorry-dave-more-autonomy-in-the-name-of-safety/</guid><description><![CDATA[Call me Old-Fashioned, but wouldn't it be better to actually, you know, teach people how to drive and make sure they know how to drive, before actually allowing them to drive?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ATLien]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 29th 2008 1:39AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on I'm sorry, Dave - more autonomy in the name of safety?]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/28/im-sorry-dave-more-autonomy-in-the-name-of-safety/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/28/im-sorry-dave-more-autonomy-in-the-name-of-safety/</guid><description><![CDATA[My On-Star sure was great Easter Sunday when I couldn't find an open service station while runing low on gas.  On-Star found one open in the area and directed me the shortest route for fuel.  Who would guess all the stations would be closed on Easter in some areas,  I think it's called Old Time rural religion.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MoonRover]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 29th 2008 6:47AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on I'm sorry, Dave - more autonomy in the name of safety?]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/28/im-sorry-dave-more-autonomy-in-the-name-of-safety/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/28/im-sorry-dave-more-autonomy-in-the-name-of-safety/</guid><description><![CDATA[And it is reasons like this why people will continue to ignore the blatant big-brother implications of this system.  If I got a new GM car, I would rip that system out ASAP.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Derek]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 29th 2008 10:15AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on I'm sorry, Dave - more autonomy in the name of safety?]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/28/im-sorry-dave-more-autonomy-in-the-name-of-safety/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/28/im-sorry-dave-more-autonomy-in-the-name-of-safety/</guid><description><![CDATA[@MoonRover...<br><br>Glad it helped you, but have you ever heard of Pay-At-The-Pump?<br><br>When a Gas Station is closed, it isn't exactly closed anymore.<br><br>That certainly doesn't outweigh the implications of an un-monitored cell-modem connected to nearly every system in your car, possibly reporting to people you don't know.<br><br>Thanks. I'll pay at the pump, and find my own way, and use my own phone.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 29th 2008 7:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on I'm sorry, Dave - more autonomy in the name of safety?]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/28/im-sorry-dave-more-autonomy-in-the-name-of-safety/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/28/im-sorry-dave-more-autonomy-in-the-name-of-safety/</guid><description><![CDATA[This reminds me of a video I just saw online of a new navigation system that would use real photographic images in place of a drawn map on the nav screen.<br><br>In essence it would be like a real video game (in the 3D sense) combined with actual photos (like Google's streetview). Did look pretty nice.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mani]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2008 3:09PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>