
Click above for high resolution images of the 2009 Acura TSX
The first generation Acura TSX received glowing reviews from the media and owners alike. While not having the most exciting styling or the beefiest of powertrains, the TSX offered a sensible and reliable vehicle with plenty of standard options that didn't break the bank. Our man Damon road-tripped a 2007 TSX up to Lake Tahoe and was pleasantly surprised with the driving characteristics and smooth powertrain, although he put Acura's turbocharged 2.3-liter inline-4 on the wish list.
With Acura launching an all-new TSX in 2009, we've been itching to see what direction they would go with the second generation. Fortunately, we didn't have to wait long to find out because Acura invited us to test the new TSX just a few weeks before officially launching the car at the New York Auto Show.
All photos Copyright ©2008 Drew Phillips / Weblogs, Inc.
Before actually getting behind the wheel, we spent significant time doing a walk-around of the car and scrutinizing the new design. The new TSX is definitely larger – 3.0 inches wider, 2.4 inches longer, a 2.6-inch wider track, and a 1.3-inch longer wheelbase. This, combined with an overall height that has been decreased by .6 inches, gives the new TSX a much more aggressive stance than before. Adding to the new look is what Acura calls "Keen-Edged Styling" that includes a new "Signature Power Plenum Grille," slight fender flares, and sharper, edgier styling than the previous design. It's polarizing for sure, but as we've mentioned before, looks better in light colors. The interior meanwhile features a similar theme with sharp, contrasting edges that make the old design look soft in comparison.
After getting acquainted with the car it was time to get on the road. The wider stance as well as new dual-mode dampers provide a comfortable ride at pretty much any speed, but also allow for a quick and direct turn-in. The steering is also weighted nicely and accurate, things we're used to in the TSX by now. While we had no complaints about handling, the powertrain was mediocre at best. The 2.4-liter inline-4 is sufficient, but still lacks real grunt. At least 4,000 rpm is required to motivate the TSX to go anywhere, but even the upper part of the rpm range isn't that fun to work with. You would hope that a high-revving engine would allow you to move through the gears quickly, but the TSX revs painfully slow, and the optional six-speed is sloppy and vague. To its credit, Acura made an effort to improve the powertrain for 2009 by revising valve timing, increasing compression, and improving the intake and exhaust flow, but it really isn't enough when compared to other engine options in this segment. Despite the inevitable torque steer that would come with it, we're still hoping for that turbocharged inline-4!
While we were left wanting more with the powertrain, we did enjoy Acura's optional technology package that came with our car. It includes a host of features including Acura's navigation system with real-time traffic and weather, XM satellite radio and a spectacular ten-speaker surround sound system with six-disc CD/DVD changer. Add to this the standard Bluetooth and USB port interface, and Acura should do well with the younger, more tech-savvy audience.
Despite the 2009 TSX being an all-new car, it almost feels like a refresh. While those in tune with the automotive industry will know the difference, the general consumer might not see a difference because of the relatively similar powertrain and styling compared to the previous model.
Overall it was tough to emotionally connect with the TSX. There's nothing wrong with the car, but nothing that jumps out and grabs us either. It does its job without much fuss, but never gets your adrenaline pumping either. After chatting with our fellow editor and codriver for some time during the drive, we even found that we forgot we were driving the TSX. It just sort of faded to the background as we ate up the miles. The interesting part is that this fits who will most likely be interested in the TSX. It's the type of car that one can buy and just forget about. It's something that doesn't appeal to the enthusiast side of us, but there are no doubt plenty of consumers who want a sub-$30,000 luxury car that is worry free, has excellent reliability and a great resale value. It would also be perfect for the young business professional who wants a nice car, but doesn't want something as flashy as a BMW or Mercedes.
Truthfully, an evaluation of the TSX doesn't show its real potential with buyers. It has been and is still a smart and logical buy. What it really comes down to is, despite its mediocre powertrain and lack of charisma, the TSX is one of the few cars we wouldn't mind using as a daily driver... as long as we had something more fun waiting for us when we got home.
All photos Copyright ©2008 Drew Phillips / Weblogs, Inc.

















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 4)
FSM @ Mar 27th 2008 12:10PM
"one of the few cars we wouldn't mind using as a daily driver... as long as we had something more fun waiting for us when we got home."
Sounds like a spouse
Ed @ Mar 27th 2008 1:28PM
That's exactly how I have it... I drive the Acura TSX cuz I drive 40 miles to work one way -- And I have a 330i (my wife drives on weekdays) for weekend fun :) The TSX is a great car, handles well, saves gas, and it's just right-sized.
Xcountryflyer @ Mar 27th 2008 2:08PM
Hopefully Honda has a Type S that is under development for the TSX for some excitement to this model and the Acura line-up in general.
As others have mentioned, this car is a pleasant car that probably will appeal to those who like Hondas or other Japanese brands. I doubt anyone looking at a 3 Series is cross shopping this car.
That said, I am disappointed that the car got bigger and got heavier without getting much additional engine power. The whole idea that cars need to get bigger with ever revision is really a bad trend and also I think Honda could have provided a slightly stronger engine that would offset the weight gain yet still be light and fuel efficient.
Honda/Acura have had some misses lately so hopefully they get back on track.
Max @ Mar 27th 2008 12:20PM
Camry!
bonh @ Mar 27th 2008 12:26PM
gross. looks like a saturn got rear ended by a camry.
Torrent @ Apr 4th 2008 4:35AM
Or a Camry and an F-150 mated to create this unholy offspring...
dreamtech @ Mar 27th 2008 12:33PM
`It would also be perfect for the young business professional who wants a nice car, but doesn't want something as flashy as a BMW or Mercedes.`
EVERY young business professional wants a BMW or Mercedes...they just can`t afford it. Flashy has nothing to do with it.
Once again Honda produces a nicer Honda and they call it an Acura.
Taylor @ Mar 27th 2008 12:41PM
It's basically a honda, but without the V-6 option. Meaning it's pretty lame. It's an average car and will get an average amount of sales. They aren't lighting the world on fire over there.
I either want a sporty car, or a car that gets great gas mileage and this car does neither.
cheezwiz @ Mar 27th 2008 12:44PM
"EVERY young business professional wants a BMW or Mercedes...they just can`t afford it. Flashy has nothing to do with it."
Don't project your views on those around you.
This is certainly not true for all the young professional buyers out there. I know that if I were looking for a sedan, I would not be shopping BMW or Mercedes, even though I probably could afford them. They just don't appeal to me, in large part because I don't appreciate the brands or the value proposition they present. (that said, I doubt I'd drive the new TSX given the reviews it's getting)
This segment is HUGE - there are many different opinions of buyers out there. It's not just a question of whether you can afford a BMW or Merc.
Jason @ Mar 27th 2008 12:45PM
I can't stand BMW or M-B so do you care to revise your statement?
Disgruntled Goat @ Mar 27th 2008 1:03PM
You probably should have said "MOST young business professional wants a BMW or Mercedes...they just can`t afford it." That statement is very true. The young, status seeking professional asks "How much car can I afford?" while the mature, wealth seeking professional asks "How much car do I need?"
Chris @ Mar 27th 2008 1:18PM
Love Disgruntled's response
It is so true.
Scott @ Mar 27th 2008 3:50PM
Most people I know either overspend on a car or a house. Which one you pick to overspend on doesn't make you more "wealth seeking" than the other guy, especially now that the housing market has collapsed.
bruno @ Mar 27th 2008 4:20PM
I drive an '06 BMW 3 series part of the time, it's a fine car, hard to beat in many regards, but when it's up for replacement I will be hoping there is a satisfactory non-bmw, non-luxury brand car out there. I hate the whole car-image BS . I just happened to need a car to drive 15,000 highway miles a year and it was the only car that met all my needs for safety, handling, power, interior space, and decent styling.
I hope the new Hyundai Genesis sedan and coupe are as-advertised. I'd gladly buy either one and enjoy the lack of negative attention the BMW brings.
btw, not "professional", not particularly young, either.
tanooki2003 @ Mar 28th 2008 9:17AM
I also would never own an MB or BMW because I am just plain sick and tired of the status symbol that evolves around them as well as using financial common sense. I would rather not tie up every single dollar I make into my car, which also applies to my home as well. I want to be able to "save" my money for future investments and be able to retire care free, financially free, and worry free without the need of social security.
Me being an international business professional I could afford one, or any car in that price range. Instead I choose to continue to drive my 99 Mitsubishi 3000GT VR4 because it is exactly the car I want and need, not to mention I am loving the idea of being car payment free since 2002 and very little maintenance. The only other car I will seek after I retire my 3000GT will be the new Hyundai Genesis Coupe.
Gregg @ Mar 27th 2008 12:34PM
Polarizing? To me it is an understated, tasteful design that fades into the woodwork of current mid-size cars.
Ron @ Mar 27th 2008 12:35PM
I really like this car - and I really like the earlier versions as well.
THe problem I saw when looking at this car is that it's a bit too expensive at $27k+ for a smaller car in my opinion, even as refined as it may be. When cross-shopping this with the Accord, I didn't like the looks of the Accord but didn't like the price tag for this one.
psarhjinian @ Mar 27th 2008 12:36PM
It seems people want this car to be more than it is. It's not a hard-core sports sedan; it's pretty much just a holistically excellent car; handles well, gets good mileage, is reliable, has decent features, good power and is priced very well.
About the only competition are upper-level trims of mainstream sedans (that don't handle as well, nor have the same equipment levels), stripped-down entry-level lux sedans (the IS, A3/A4, 9-3, S40 or 3-Series at this price point are slow and spartan) or hotted two- and four-doors (Evo, WRX, Mustang, etc) that are way down on refinement.
About the only direct competitor still available is the Jetta, which requires taking a bit of a risk with regards to reliability.
Again, this car is like a nice lunch. It didn't cost you much, and it may not have had the largest portions or the finest ingredients, but overall it was well done and a great value. I personally don't see what's wrong with that, and I suspect that a lot of people who aren't hardcore enthusiasts will, too. Holistically good cars don't play well to spec-sheet jockeys and gearheads, but they do sell well to everyone else.
Acura could up the car's power (and wreck the TSX's generally dynamics), but that would put it's price uncomfortably close to the TL, which most Acura buyers would have gone for anyway. If anything, Acura should decontent this car and try to get the buyers it lost when it killed the RSX.
carsteve @ Mar 27th 2008 12:52PM
This is one of the best, thorough responses I've read on this site.
ToddL @ Mar 27th 2008 1:30PM
"stripped-down entry-level lux sedans (the IS, A3/A4, 9-3, S40 or 3-Series at this price point are slow and spartan)"
Not sure I agree with this statement, at least for the 3-series. When I bought my 325i I cross-shopped the TSX. It was a little less money, and had more content (nav, etc) for maybe $5k less. The 325i (now 328i) pulls a 14.7 1/4, though, which is considerably faster than the TSX. The 325i also handles a fair bit better than the TSX.