<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/25/bentley-rules-out-w16-and-diesel-engines/</link>
<description>Autoblog Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/25/bentley-rules-out-w16-and-diesel-engines/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/25/bentley-rules-out-w16-and-diesel-engines/</guid><description><![CDATA[I agree with Bentley, it would be nuts to go the diesel route now! It is only really in Europe where diesels are seen as being acceptable, and even in Europe the only "luxury" cars that get diesels are fleet S-Classes that ferry VIPs around, that's to say glorified taxies.<br><br>Given that nothing in the league of Bentley is diesel, it would be a tad risky to try and be the first. <br><br>I'd say they are much better off going the hybrid/E85 route. That's far more acceptable the world over, and less likely to tarnish the brand. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[cunawarit]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 26th 2008 4:45PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>