<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog - Comments for Did we say 50/50?  Audi R8 V12 TDI not coming, 4.2 V8 TDI instead</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/20/did-we-say-50-50-audi-r8-v12-tdi-not-coming-4-2-v8-tdi-instea/</link>
<description>Autoblog Comments for Did we say 50/50?  Audi R8 V12 TDI not coming, 4.2 V8 TDI instead</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Did we say 50/50?  Audi R8 V12 TDI not coming, 4.2 V8 TDI instead]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/20/did-we-say-50-50-audi-r8-v12-tdi-not-coming-4-2-v8-tdi-instea/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/20/did-we-say-50-50-audi-r8-v12-tdi-not-coming-4-2-v8-tdi-instea/</guid><description><![CDATA[Me thinks thou doth complain too much ;)... 550lb-ft. of torque will easily waste a set of perfectly good rubberbands in a matter of moments.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Pete]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 20th 2008 9:01AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>