<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog - Comments for Lutz says GM considering 2.0-liter turbo for Camaro</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/19/lutz-says-gm-considering-2-0-liter-turbo-for-camaro/</link>
<description>Autoblog Comments for Lutz says GM considering 2.0-liter turbo for Camaro</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Lutz says GM considering 2.0-liter turbo for Camaro]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/19/lutz-says-gm-considering-2-0-liter-turbo-for-camaro/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/19/lutz-says-gm-considering-2-0-liter-turbo-for-camaro/</guid><description><![CDATA[all depends on power to weight ratio, and gearing.<br><br>referencing the low points doesnt help the case and using best case as a reference doesnt work if you dont reference power to weight.<br><br>But yeah, a Cobalt SS that beats out a stock Camaro edges on blasphemy.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[geo.stewart]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 19th 2008 6:25PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>