Add your comments
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments.
Officially Official: 2009 Ford Focus RS
I want my FPV: Super sedans hit the desert in new TV spot
Happy Independence Day from Autoblog
British Motor Show Preview: Opel Insignia to debut in hatch and sedan forms
Rumormill: Ford reviving Mustang SVO with 300 hp Ecoboost four
Track Test: 2008 Roush 427R Trak Pak Mustang
In the Autoblog Garage: 2008 Porsche Cayman S
First Drive: 2009 Chevrolet Traverse
In the Autoblog Garage: 2008 Mazda MX-5 Miata Retractable Hard Top
In The Autoblog Garage: BMW 128i Convertible
Reader Comments for
Subscribe to this thread(Page 1 of 1)
geo.stewart @ Mar 17th 2008 2:07PM
the car is 80-85% the price of a comparably equipped S40, about right. remember, this comes with the T5, not the 2.4i. base price still slots in below the 2.4i S40.
yes, it might be overpriced re: competition but is in line with Volvo pricing in general. Like the new IS-F, its not going to steal any MS3 buyers but give Volvo-lovers something to go after. Another year or 2 and deals will start to trickle to make them more competitive.
Besides, that back hatch kills usability.