<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/15/new-york-08-preview-2010-pontiac-sports-truck-gm-wants-you-to/</link>
<description>Autoblog Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/15/new-york-08-preview-2010-pontiac-sports-truck-gm-wants-you-to/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/15/new-york-08-preview-2010-pontiac-sports-truck-gm-wants-you-to/</guid><description><![CDATA[who cares wat the name is...just build it]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Austin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 15th 2008 12:03AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/15/new-york-08-preview-2010-pontiac-sports-truck-gm-wants-you-to/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/15/new-york-08-preview-2010-pontiac-sports-truck-gm-wants-you-to/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's a real looker but I don't think Pontiac should sell trucks. This should be marketed by Chevy or GMC. I am sure it will have a 6-cylinder but what about a 4-cylinder engine for those mileage conscious?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 15th 2008 7:47AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/15/new-york-08-preview-2010-pontiac-sports-truck-gm-wants-you-to/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/15/new-york-08-preview-2010-pontiac-sports-truck-gm-wants-you-to/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm still pulling for the G8-R, ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[geo.stewart]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 15th 2008 8:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/15/new-york-08-preview-2010-pontiac-sports-truck-gm-wants-you-to/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/15/new-york-08-preview-2010-pontiac-sports-truck-gm-wants-you-to/</guid><description><![CDATA[The EcoTerrorist?<br>The ChinaSlave?<br>The WarMonger?<br><br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 15th 2008 9:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/15/new-york-08-preview-2010-pontiac-sports-truck-gm-wants-you-to/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/15/new-york-08-preview-2010-pontiac-sports-truck-gm-wants-you-to/</guid><description><![CDATA[We're getting this and NOT the wagon...How about the the "baitnswitch"...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Luis]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 15th 2008 11:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/15/new-york-08-preview-2010-pontiac-sports-truck-gm-wants-you-to/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/15/new-york-08-preview-2010-pontiac-sports-truck-gm-wants-you-to/</guid><description><![CDATA[Call it the Pontiac SUX A-SS. Seriously, what kind of backword-ass strategy is this? GM needs to ax the arrowhead and finish fixing the bow-tie.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[cameron42985]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 15th 2008 12:10AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/15/new-york-08-preview-2010-pontiac-sports-truck-gm-wants-you-to/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/15/new-york-08-preview-2010-pontiac-sports-truck-gm-wants-you-to/</guid><description><![CDATA[Is "Mistake" taken?  <br><br>If someone could explain how this fits into to Buick-Pontiac-GMC channel strategy where Pontiac plays the sporty role and GMC is trucks, I would appreciate it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tool]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 15th 2008 12:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/15/new-york-08-preview-2010-pontiac-sports-truck-gm-wants-you-to/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/15/new-york-08-preview-2010-pontiac-sports-truck-gm-wants-you-to/</guid><description><![CDATA[How it fits into the GM's car/truck Strategy?<br><br>Build as many vehicles with Gas Guzzler V8's as possible, GM is a Subsidiary of ExxonMobile.  You can tell what INCENTIVES a company has by what products it designs, especially in a high fuel cost, foreign oil and Global Warming environment.  Exxon must be paying some Big Incentives to release MORE Guzzlers while everyone is complaining about fuel cost, while our forests are going up in smoke, and water supply's drying up, and while our troops are in a foreign land defending the oil pumping stations.<br><br>Why does GM Hate America?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 15th 2008 9:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/15/new-york-08-preview-2010-pontiac-sports-truck-gm-wants-you-to/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/15/new-york-08-preview-2010-pontiac-sports-truck-gm-wants-you-to/</guid><description><![CDATA[That's good knowledge, Mike. More ought to share it. GM's 'earth-friendly' commercials are as confusing and dismissive as R.J. Reynolds' 'anti-smoking' ads.<br><br>I think I'll go kill my TV now. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[cameron42985]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2008 10:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/15/new-york-08-preview-2010-pontiac-sports-truck-gm-wants-you-to/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/15/new-york-08-preview-2010-pontiac-sports-truck-gm-wants-you-to/</guid><description><![CDATA[More like WHY DOES AMERICA HATE GM?<br>Toyota makes lots of gas guzling V8s, are they subsidized by Chevron?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 16th 2008 10:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/15/new-york-08-preview-2010-pontiac-sports-truck-gm-wants-you-to/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/15/new-york-08-preview-2010-pontiac-sports-truck-gm-wants-you-to/</guid><description><![CDATA[Toyota makes gas-guzzling V8s (well, namely the Tundra and Sequoia) because that's what Americans think they want/need. The reason they think that is because they've been convinced by certain automakers (which, let's face it, are all American) that they need large trucks. It's a manufactured demand.<br><br>This Pontiac? Utter failure. Epic fail on every level. GM bureaucrats and board members deserve what they've got coming to them; it's sad that the autoworkers will be the biggest victims here.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[KA]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 17th 2008 1:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/15/new-york-08-preview-2010-pontiac-sports-truck-gm-wants-you-to/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/15/new-york-08-preview-2010-pontiac-sports-truck-gm-wants-you-to/</guid><description><![CDATA[@KA,<br><br>Manufactured demand?  GM didn't force me to buy a Suburban, I wanted one.  I like long wheelbase, wide full-frame vehicles.  I wasn't tricked into thinking I needed it.  Truth be told I'm still miffed I can't go out and buy a new B-Body Wagon, but oh well.  OH and to further boil your blood I drive my Suburban alone to work everyday.  And I'm single, the third row seat only sees use when I take some of my buddies on fishing trips, most of the time its a 1 passenger vehicle.  I also take the third row out which allows me to drive my ATV into the Suburban.  But nobody forced me to buy this, its simply the best vehicle to fulfill what I want.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Frylock350]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 17th 2008 9:15AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/15/new-york-08-preview-2010-pontiac-sports-truck-gm-wants-you-to/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/15/new-york-08-preview-2010-pontiac-sports-truck-gm-wants-you-to/</guid><description><![CDATA[looks pretty tight. Please Lord; let it do better than the SSR.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Torrent]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 15th 2008 12:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/15/new-york-08-preview-2010-pontiac-sports-truck-gm-wants-you-to/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/15/new-york-08-preview-2010-pontiac-sports-truck-gm-wants-you-to/</guid><description><![CDATA[I actually would've liked the SportWagon version better.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Torrent]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 15th 2008 3:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/15/new-york-08-preview-2010-pontiac-sports-truck-gm-wants-you-to/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/15/new-york-08-preview-2010-pontiac-sports-truck-gm-wants-you-to/</guid><description><![CDATA[I would also like the sportswagon over this bodystyle.<br>I guess that makes us uncool.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SPG]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 15th 2008 5:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/15/new-york-08-preview-2010-pontiac-sports-truck-gm-wants-you-to/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/15/new-york-08-preview-2010-pontiac-sports-truck-gm-wants-you-to/</guid><description><![CDATA[As nice as it looks, this concept angers me deeply. At least the A-BAT tried to be fuel-efficient. With V6 and V8 engines of this size (and let us not forget they use premium fuel according to the specs), the fuel economy on this thing will be no better than a Chevy Camaro. At which point, I'd take the Camaro. And then I'd buy a used Toyota Tacoma or Ford F-150 when I needed to haul something.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[The Luigiian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 15th 2008 12:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/15/new-york-08-preview-2010-pontiac-sports-truck-gm-wants-you-to/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/15/new-york-08-preview-2010-pontiac-sports-truck-gm-wants-you-to/</guid><description><![CDATA[You're missing the point entirely.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Pokey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 15th 2008 12:38AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/15/new-york-08-preview-2010-pontiac-sports-truck-gm-wants-you-to/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/15/new-york-08-preview-2010-pontiac-sports-truck-gm-wants-you-to/</guid><description><![CDATA[If the point were "performance and handling with the usability of a compact truck", I'd think they'd have had this a long time ago, since that was when fuel economy wasn't as necessary and consumers could get performance without paying too much at the pump for it. Considering the fact that this truck is being built during a gas crunch, and considering that the press release says it "has the fuel economy of a car", I don't think it's too much to ask for it to actually have decent fuel efficiency. I know it has the fuel efficiency of a midsize performance car, but c'mon, the Ford F-150 has the fuel efficency of a car, too, it's just that the car you're comparing it to is a Lamborghini Gallardo.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[The Luigiian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 15th 2008 12:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/15/new-york-08-preview-2010-pontiac-sports-truck-gm-wants-you-to/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/15/new-york-08-preview-2010-pontiac-sports-truck-gm-wants-you-to/</guid><description><![CDATA[If you're so concerned about fuel economy that a car with a V8 makes you "deeply angry", this was never for you.<br><br>Good fuel economy is as simple as A) smaller and B) not a performance car.  We already have scores of vehicles like that and you're free to buy any of them.<br><br>This niche 2 seater isn't about fuel economy any more than it's about offroad ability or holding lots of child seats.  That isn't good or bad, it's just different.  <br><br>Personally I think ~20mpg real world is pretty good when the alternative would be a real truck getting around 14.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 15th 2008 4:05AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/15/new-york-08-preview-2010-pontiac-sports-truck-gm-wants-you-to/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/15/new-york-08-preview-2010-pontiac-sports-truck-gm-wants-you-to/</guid><description><![CDATA[One of GM reasons for offering the vehicle is for people who do not want the performance loss inherent a truck (ie. being raised off the ground is not good for performance); but in the current plan they want to give peopel a more efficient alternative to the truck (again, raising a vehicle off the ground wrecks it efficiency).<br><br>In otherwords, for the domestic market where the "truck" feature is largely used for the weekend or light duty -- the V6 and V8 will have a huge efficiency advantage over a truck.  They could hybrid it like Toyota; but because the inherent physics is so much better, they do not HAVE to do it like the Toyota project.<br><br>Remember, a truck is generally heavier, and the physics requires more "power" to keep up to a lighter car.  Therefore, you get a lot of the features of the truck with using the efficiencies of a car.<br><br>The catch is that IF you use it as a truck mostly, or go off roading or into construction sites -- the value of going with a full truck goes up; and would justify spending more money on fuel or a hybrid system.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Glenn]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 15th 2008 3:55PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>