Add your comments
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments.
Reader Spy: Chevy Volt caught on set of Transformers 2
Spy Shot: Production interior of Chevy Volt (maybe)
Rumormill: Lexus LF-A... Stillborn?
Ford reveals 2010 Mustang badge
REPORT: Chrysler may sell Dodge Viper rather than kill it
In the Autoblog Garage: 2009 Nissan Murano
In the Autoblog Garage: 2009 Dodge Journey R/T
In the Autoblog Garage: 2008 Jeep Compass Sport 4x2
In the Autoblog Garage: 2008 Porsche Carrera S
First Drive: 2009 Honda Fit Sport
Reader Comments for
Subscribe to this threadMess with the Ferarri and we'll take our prancing horse back
(Page 1 of 1)
Kattleox @ Mar 14th 2008 9:34AM
They are thinking along the lines of an artist who sells his work to a museum only to have it cut in half and filled with nine and a half feet of somebody elses art that kinda matches. And they arent wanting money, but the removal of the badges (aka signature).
I don't side with ferrari, but I can definitely see where they are coming from.
DKB_SATX @ Mar 14th 2008 11:59AM
I understand your thinking here, but the more appropriate situation is someone taking a PRINT of some artistic work and modifying it. Your example would apply to the original artwork, or to some handmade custom one-off vehicle that Ferrari produced, not to a series-built 360 Modena.