Add your comments
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments.













Reader Comments for
Subscribe to this threadNissan GT-R meets the dyno, a 997 Porsche Turbo and an E92 BMW M3
(Page 1 of 1)
spdracerut @ Mar 13th 2008 11:49AM
Heck, dyno 'numbers' in general are pretty pointless. Have just the dyno plots of a single car has some value, it shows the torque (and therefore horsepower) curves.
These tests are very interesting because they actually compare two cars on the same dyno. The 911 turbo is rated at 480ps and the GTR at roughly the same. Surprise surprise, they acutally point down the same power on the same dyno.
Interesting bits, even though the 911 has a smaller motor, its torque ramps up faster due to the VGT turbos. The GTR is superior from 3.5k to 6k rpms though, right in the meat of the rev range where you'd be spending your time on a road course.
LS2/LS7, two different UK mags have compared the GTR to a 911 turbo and GT3, and both times the GTR has been faster around the road course. Easier to drive and it puts down the power much better allowing for better corner exit speeds.