Add your comments
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments.













Reader Comments for
Subscribe to this threadNissan GT-R meets the dyno, a 997 Porsche Turbo and an E92 BMW M3
(Page 1 of 1)
Yar @ Mar 13th 2008 9:40AM
"Despite the Bimmer's impressive flat torque curve..."
Wait, the new M3 has torque? That's news to me...
71cuda @ Mar 13th 2008 9:49AM
I think they're impressed with the flatness of the curve, not the actual amount of torque. It appears to stay between 250 and 275 lb/ft for most of the pull, well below the GT-R.
Paul H @ Mar 13th 2008 10:03AM
Perhaps they should have enclosed the whole torque comment for the M3 in "sarcasm" tags.
tuna @ Mar 13th 2008 2:26PM
Flat torque curve is the mark of all BMW M cars. Peak torque is only significant for magazine write-ups and bench racer bragging rights. Flat torque curve translates to versatility and available power through-out the broad RPM range. Note, this doesn't mean that it is better than the next car. It just tells you how the driver must adapt his/her driving style to be fast or faster.
HeyHuub @ Mar 14th 2008 3:56AM
Name me an atmosperic 4.0 V8 that produces more torque then the M3's V8.