Add your comments
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments.
Spy Shots: Production Audi TT Clubsport Quattro
Chevy Camaro getting early unveil at Indy in September
James Garner recovering from mild stroke
VIDEO: God's ringtone is a V10-powered Audi R8
IIHS releases official results on the smart fortwo
First Drive: 2009 Ford Escapes, more of almost everything
Autoline on Autoblog with John McElroy
In the Autoblog Garage: 2008 Ford Shelby GT500 Mustang
Future Classic: 1984 Chrysler Minivans
_thumbnail.jpg "Lamborghini Reventon unboxed in Las Vegas")
Reader Comments for
Subscribe to this threadKitschy Cat: Galpinized Jaguar XF
(Page 1 of 1)
Ubizzle @ Mar 12th 2008 5:55PM
The headlights are there purely to comply with certain regulations, but i can't remember the exact ones. So, yeah, they couldn't really change them... And it's not that they're ugly, it's that they don't match how stunning they concept's were.
Yaroukh @ Mar 12th 2008 6:06PM
No offense mate, but this is BS. Check-out Alfa Romeo 159. Don't they need to comply to regulations?