Add your comments
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments.










Reader Comments for
Subscribe to this threadChevy Camaro to be a 2010 model, not 2009
(Page 1 of 1)
Tool @ Mar 12th 2008 3:08PM
Wouldn't it have been smart to do a short run of 2009 MY vehicles--this would make them more exclusive and highly desirable--and then shift over to 2010?
If I've read correctly, that's what the new New Chrysler is doing with the Challenger.
Once again, it seems like GM shoots itself in the foot. Just when it seems like they've got their sh*t together, they do something really dumb.
3seriesisking @ Mar 12th 2008 3:13PM
I agree. It seems unlikely that they will be able to hold up the hype they've built up for this car much longer. I mean it seems to me that initially, a lot of people were pretty psyched about the new Camaro, but postponing it until 2010? Seems like a bad move to me.
meshies @ Mar 12th 2008 4:09PM
If GM knew what was really good for them, they would pull a surprise release way ahead of our expectations. Im still thinking they just might pull a fast one on us.
TBlueMax @ Mar 12th 2008 7:09PM
Actually, it is very expensive from a Marketing perspective to generate consumer-focused print media (which already experiences a limited lifespan) for something that is generally considered a huge launch (Camaro), to turn around and have to update that print media for the following model year in just a few months. Same with service manual information, et al.
I would rather see GM do their cost-cutting in ways that do not impact the product or consumer. If they can save a few bucks in marketing by offering a 2010 model for 1.5 yrs, I'm all for it.