<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog - Comments for In the Autoblog Garage: 2008 Dodge Dakota Sport</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/10/in-the-autoblog-garage-2008-dodge-dakota-sport/</link>
<description>Autoblog Comments for In the Autoblog Garage: 2008 Dodge Dakota Sport</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on In the Autoblog Garage: 2008 Dodge Dakota Sport]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/10/in-the-autoblog-garage-2008-dodge-dakota-sport/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/10/in-the-autoblog-garage-2008-dodge-dakota-sport/</guid><description><![CDATA[You forgot to mention the ten percent increase in spending when using "flex fuel". <br>i'm sure the milage will improve when the winter blend fuel gets switched for the summer stuff.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bigrig]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 10th 2008 12:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on In the Autoblog Garage: 2008 Dodge Dakota Sport]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/10/in-the-autoblog-garage-2008-dodge-dakota-sport/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/10/in-the-autoblog-garage-2008-dodge-dakota-sport/</guid><description><![CDATA[hey, just let me know when you find the Jenny McCarthy of trucks- easy on the eyes and can hang with the men.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[geo.stewart]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 10th 2008 2:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on In the Autoblog Garage: 2008 Dodge Dakota Sport]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/10/in-the-autoblog-garage-2008-dodge-dakota-sport/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/10/in-the-autoblog-garage-2008-dodge-dakota-sport/</guid><description><![CDATA[I will dissent, I don't mind the new styling of this truck at all.  It's distinctive and it looks like a real truck which is always a good thing.  Now if only they offered the HEMI in it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TriShield]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 10th 2008 12:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on In the Autoblog Garage: 2008 Dodge Dakota Sport]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/10/in-the-autoblog-garage-2008-dodge-dakota-sport/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/10/in-the-autoblog-garage-2008-dodge-dakota-sport/</guid><description><![CDATA[I too would have liked a HEMI, but with 300HP/330torque its more than capable.  <br><br>I also liked the review, because you got past the looks and plastic and focused on what people will probably use them for, towing/hauling.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MemphisNET]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 10th 2008 12:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on In the Autoblog Garage: 2008 Dodge Dakota Sport]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/10/in-the-autoblog-garage-2008-dodge-dakota-sport/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/10/in-the-autoblog-garage-2008-dodge-dakota-sport/</guid><description><![CDATA[I also like the look of this truck in its all blacked out guise.  Usually a sucker for the Inferno Red, but this is better.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MemphisNET]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 10th 2008 12:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on In the Autoblog Garage: 2008 Dodge Dakota Sport]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/10/in-the-autoblog-garage-2008-dodge-dakota-sport/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/10/in-the-autoblog-garage-2008-dodge-dakota-sport/</guid><description><![CDATA[$27,945? <br><br>What is the point when you can buy a Ram for the same price? ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[spencer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 10th 2008 12:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on In the Autoblog Garage: 2008 Dodge Dakota Sport]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/10/in-the-autoblog-garage-2008-dodge-dakota-sport/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/10/in-the-autoblog-garage-2008-dodge-dakota-sport/</guid><description><![CDATA[because a Ram with the options you'd likely want can very easily run you over $35k]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 10th 2008 12:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on In the Autoblog Garage: 2008 Dodge Dakota Sport]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/10/in-the-autoblog-garage-2008-dodge-dakota-sport/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/10/in-the-autoblog-garage-2008-dodge-dakota-sport/</guid><description><![CDATA[But you can easily find one for less than that with rebates and discounts. Even a 2500 model.<br><br><a href="http://newspaperads.macon.com/ROP/ads.aspx?advid=732800&adid=5886000&cat=3379" rel="nofollow">http://newspaperads.macon.com/ROP/ads.aspx?advid=732800&adid=5886000&cat=3379</a><br><br>I think it's silly to get a smaller truck with leather and a subwoofer instead of a much more capable truck that only has a cloth interior.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Spencer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 10th 2008 1:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on In the Autoblog Garage: 2008 Dodge Dakota Sport]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/10/in-the-autoblog-garage-2008-dodge-dakota-sport/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/10/in-the-autoblog-garage-2008-dodge-dakota-sport/</guid><description><![CDATA[Spencer, those 'new' vehicles are rarely brand new factory shipped.  Some have been sitting on lots, most of those ad's were for 07's (we've been into 08's since August of last year).  Some are even bancrupty buy-outs.  They're clearing inventory.<br><br>Having said that, I wouldn't sneeze at any of those deals.  But if you're the type that leases something brand spanking new, those prices are right in line.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MemphisNET]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 10th 2008 1:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on In the Autoblog Garage: 2008 Dodge Dakota Sport]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/10/in-the-autoblog-garage-2008-dodge-dakota-sport/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/10/in-the-autoblog-garage-2008-dodge-dakota-sport/</guid><description><![CDATA["$27,945?<br><br>What is the point when you can buy a Ram for the same price?"<br><br>Well, now we know why they aren't selling any Dakotas :p]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 10th 2008 2:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on In the Autoblog Garage: 2008 Dodge Dakota Sport]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/10/in-the-autoblog-garage-2008-dodge-dakota-sport/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/10/in-the-autoblog-garage-2008-dodge-dakota-sport/</guid><description><![CDATA[This truck is a neither nor.<br><br>Costs as much as a full size, uses gas like a fullsize, hard to park in the city like a fullsize.<br><br>But it won't carry plywood between the wheels, only has a 22 gallon tank, doesn't have a useable back seat unless you spend $2500 more for the crew cab.<br><br>At least the new 4.7 finally has some balls.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 10th 2008 2:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on In the Autoblog Garage: 2008 Dodge Dakota Sport]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/10/in-the-autoblog-garage-2008-dodge-dakota-sport/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/10/in-the-autoblog-garage-2008-dodge-dakota-sport/</guid><description><![CDATA[Spencer...With that logic, no one should spend the money on a midsizer. Ever see where the prices for the Tacoma or Frontier can go? Or even the Colorado and Ranger? <br><br>The Taco can easily rise over $30k...FOR A FREAKIN V-6!!!! ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[That One Person]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 10th 2008 4:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on In the Autoblog Garage: 2008 Dodge Dakota Sport]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/10/in-the-autoblog-garage-2008-dodge-dakota-sport/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/10/in-the-autoblog-garage-2008-dodge-dakota-sport/</guid><description><![CDATA[Not a bad looking truck at all and it serves it's purpose very well towing/hauling and who cares if it has a cheap plastic interior it's a truck.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mercury Mountaineer 06]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 10th 2008 12:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on In the Autoblog Garage: 2008 Dodge Dakota Sport]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/10/in-the-autoblog-garage-2008-dodge-dakota-sport/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/10/in-the-autoblog-garage-2008-dodge-dakota-sport/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm warming up to the look of it as well. Its not my favorite looking pickup but its definitely better looking than the Tacoma(big pig looking front end) or a Crew-Cab Frontier(disproportioned). Honestly I also think criticisms of Chrysler's interior materials are overblown as well, especially when it comes to trucks. So it isn't soft touch, but it also won't scratch up as quickly and its almost definitely easier to clean. They also feel nicely put together, even if the dash doesn't feel that good at least it feels like it won't come off.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 10th 2008 12:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on In the Autoblog Garage: 2008 Dodge Dakota Sport]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/10/in-the-autoblog-garage-2008-dodge-dakota-sport/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/10/in-the-autoblog-garage-2008-dodge-dakota-sport/</guid><description><![CDATA[The interior looks worse when it's scratched, but you have to REALLY try and have course/rough things going over it in the first place.<br><br>The plastics in my new work truck (07 Ram Sport) are tinny and loud, but they 'look' fine.  <br><br>Having said that, can't wait for the 09's]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MemphisNET]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 10th 2008 1:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on In the Autoblog Garage: 2008 Dodge Dakota Sport]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/10/in-the-autoblog-garage-2008-dodge-dakota-sport/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/10/in-the-autoblog-garage-2008-dodge-dakota-sport/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm liking the design of it too. And thhe Sport package gives it a distinctive look.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[friko]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 10th 2008 1:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on In the Autoblog Garage: 2008 Dodge Dakota Sport]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/10/in-the-autoblog-garage-2008-dodge-dakota-sport/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/10/in-the-autoblog-garage-2008-dodge-dakota-sport/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm not a truck person, but if I was, I'd probably pick the 2.3L Ranger/B-Series.  No, sorry, that's a lie.  I'd probably just rent, which is sad because the reason I wouldn't buy one is because Ranger is badly dated and everything else is just too damn big.<br><br>Fundamentally, it's fine, but some extra saftey features (stability control is a useful thing in a vehicle that tends to roll over more than the average car) would be nice without having to step into wanna-be half-tons like this or the Tacoma.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[psarhjinian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 10th 2008 1:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on In the Autoblog Garage: 2008 Dodge Dakota Sport]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/10/in-the-autoblog-garage-2008-dodge-dakota-sport/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/10/in-the-autoblog-garage-2008-dodge-dakota-sport/</guid><description><![CDATA[Proof that Autoblog writers are very different cats in comparison to myself--today's Dakota is easily the best looking one ever, IMO.  Previous versions looked like they were originally slated for waterfall grilles as Buicks. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BlazerUnit]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 10th 2008 1:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on In the Autoblog Garage: 2008 Dodge Dakota Sport]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/10/in-the-autoblog-garage-2008-dodge-dakota-sport/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/10/in-the-autoblog-garage-2008-dodge-dakota-sport/</guid><description><![CDATA[As far as the looks go, I think it's pretty sharp.  As far as the price goes, I think it's absurd.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mark_welby]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 10th 2008 1:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on In the Autoblog Garage: 2008 Dodge Dakota Sport]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/10/in-the-autoblog-garage-2008-dodge-dakota-sport/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/10/in-the-autoblog-garage-2008-dodge-dakota-sport/</guid><description><![CDATA[The new front end is generally hideous, but in all black isn't too bad.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[The Other Bob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 10th 2008 1:39PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>