http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/geneva-2008-production-toyota-iq-unveiled-smart-in-sight/ Autoblog Comments for http://www.autoblog.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.autoblog.com en-us Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/geneva-2008-production-toyota-iq-unveiled-smart-in-sight/http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/geneva-2008-production-toyota-iq-unveiled-smart-in-sight/
Wow. So your anecdotal experience is somehow transferrable onto the millions of cars Toyota sells? That's a neat trick.

I love the "My ____ lasted five million miles" or " My _____ had six engines, four transmissions and three alternators in 20 miles." stories that people try to infer to an entire brand. Sure, you're entitled to buy (or not buy) based on experience, but making the leap from one experience to whole brand is a logical fallacy.]]>Mar 4th 2008 11:18AMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/geneva-2008-production-toyota-iq-unveiled-smart-in-sight/http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/geneva-2008-production-toyota-iq-unveiled-smart-in-sight/
I love the "My ____ lasted five million miles" or " My _____ had six engines, four transmissions and three alternators in 20 miles." stories that people try to infer to an entire brand. Sure, you're entitled to buy (or not buy) based on experience, but making the leap from one experience to whole brand is a logical fallacy.


As I said in my post look around on the web it’s a big problem several at the Trans. Shop in for the same thing he said “You would think they would last longer but we see them all the time for the same bearing” That is what made me post . Oh I have a "neat trick" for psarhjinian why don’t you read the whole post then look at the web under Toyota trans. failure be fore you make another pompous reply.
]]>Mar 4th 2008 5:53PM