<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/geneva-2008-production-toyota-iq-unveiled-smart-in-sight/</link>
<description>Autoblog Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/geneva-2008-production-toyota-iq-unveiled-smart-in-sight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/geneva-2008-production-toyota-iq-unveiled-smart-in-sight/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why does everyone have to imply that they're ripping off the smart? Europe (and Asia) have had micro cars forever...maybe its because the smart is now in the U.S., so it actually exists, now? This is a category of 'micro car', so how much design leverage does anyone have? "Hey! Look at that new Tank, they ripped off the old Tank!"]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Everett]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2008 9:39AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/geneva-2008-production-toyota-iq-unveiled-smart-in-sight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/geneva-2008-production-toyota-iq-unveiled-smart-in-sight/</guid><description><![CDATA[Even Toyota implies they are ripping off the Smart car.  Thye call it the "IQ" for a reason.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[The Other Bob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2008 11:03AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>