Add your comments
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments.










Reader Comments for
Subscribe to this threadGeneva 2008: Bentley's future involves drawing straw
(Page 1 of 1)
Michael D. @ Mar 4th 2008 5:32PM
I posted this on a couple of other blogs, and I figured I'd post this here, too:
Applying technologies for efficiency and emission control is all well and good, and I'm all for it (direct Injection, auto stop-start, transmission innovations, etc.), but would this mean Bentley humbling or selling out? I certainly hope not! If lighter weight comes from more aluminum construction (i.e., Audi A8 or Jaguar XJ) and perhaps applications of Carbon-fiber and Magnesium, that's very good, but not the expense of downsizing or shrinking the beautiful stately Bentley machines. Also, like I said, I support the added innovations and technologies, but not reductions in engine displacement and power and/or lesser cylinders. Bentley, like other upper-eschelon marques, is NOT about humility.
I do agree with GM's car-czar "Maximum" Bob Lutz on this:
"If you want less C02 emissions, breath less times per minute"
"Global warming is a crock of #@*&%"
I certainly hope that future Bentley's aren't going to be compromised as a result.