<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/geneva-2008-audi-tt-2-0-tdi-quattro/</link>
<description>Autoblog Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/geneva-2008-audi-tt-2-0-tdi-quattro/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/geneva-2008-audi-tt-2-0-tdi-quattro/</guid><description><![CDATA[Nagma,<br>First of all, relax. <br>Secondly, let's talk about the effect of having more mass on the nose. Understeer. Subaru and particularly the Evo doenst have that problem because its AWD is rear wheel biased. This allows for the car to rotate better.<br>In the Evo the AWD system goes a notch above with torque vectoring. It allows it to pull .99G on the skid pad.<br><br>And please dont bring in the TSX or Civic Si in this example. No body calls them "sports Cars' and they are not in the same price league.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Valentino Amoro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2008 2:18AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>