<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/geneva-2008-audi-tt-2-0-tdi-quattro/</link>
<description>Autoblog Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/geneva-2008-audi-tt-2-0-tdi-quattro/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/geneva-2008-audi-tt-2-0-tdi-quattro/</guid><description><![CDATA[nose heavy? LOOOOOOOOOOOOOL<br><br>The TT is not more nose heavy as other cars with travers mounted 4 banger...<br><br>60/40% TT Mk I <br>58/42% TT MKII<br><br>that is the same as<br><br>2008 Mitsubishi Lancer 60/40<br>2004 Subrau WRX STI 58/42<br><br>never heared a internetkid claiming both nose heavy with exactly the same nose heavy layout as the TT<br><br>60/40 in the old TT MKI  is better as<br><br>better as 2008 Honda Civic SI Coupe with 61/39%<br>better as Accura TSX 67/33%<br><br>not to talk about the 58/42% of the new MK II<br><br>This TT quattro TDI weights 3030lbs<br>2007 RX-8 2970lbs RWD<br>2005 WRX STI 3290lbs AWD<br>2008 EVO X GSR 3344lbs AWD<br><br>you call that heacvy???????? <br><br>Boy you have absolutley no plan what you are talking about!!!!!!!!!!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nagmashot]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2008 2:10AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>