http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/by-the-numbers-february-2008/ Autoblog Comments for http://www.autoblog.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.autoblog.com en-us Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/by-the-numbers-february-2008/http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/by-the-numbers-february-2008/Mar 4th 2008 12:14PMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/by-the-numbers-february-2008/http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/by-the-numbers-february-2008/Mar 4th 2008 12:18PMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/by-the-numbers-february-2008/http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/by-the-numbers-february-2008/Mar 4th 2008 12:18PMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/by-the-numbers-february-2008/http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/by-the-numbers-february-2008/;-)
If you read the entire article, they include the details that the %s are based on daily averages based on selling days.

with this yr having 25 vs last yr 24; Infiniti sold 404.33 last yr each day vs 402.72 this yr each selling day. Nissan did a similar thing, as did suzuki and vw

It is confusing considering they give total sales numbers instead of daily averages that they are reporting on. Since AB is pulling this from somewhere else, dont think we can fault them that.]]>Mar 4th 2008 12:22PMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/by-the-numbers-february-2008/http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/by-the-numbers-february-2008/Mar 4th 2008 12:29PM