<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/by-the-numbers-february-2008/</link>
<description>Autoblog Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/by-the-numbers-february-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/by-the-numbers-february-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[You guys get a point for the sucking leap day comment.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bennet Pullen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2008 12:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/by-the-numbers-february-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/by-the-numbers-february-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[Infiniti's % should have gone up, not down.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[A A]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2008 12:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/by-the-numbers-february-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/by-the-numbers-february-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[Nope...they are measuring the daily sales rate...not # of vehicles sold...February had an extra sales day this year...and thus, though Infiniti sold more cars this year than last in the month, its daily sales rate still declined....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dan spalinger]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2008 12:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/by-the-numbers-february-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/by-the-numbers-february-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[So should have Nissan's when you just look at the above number but the calculations are based on DSR.... daily sales rate not volume. When the extra day for the month is factored in,even though the volume for the month appears up, the daily sales rate is down. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2008 12:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/by-the-numbers-february-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/by-the-numbers-february-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[now see, no one thought you were illiterate or arithmetically challenged until you spoke up.<br>;-)<br>If you read the entire article, they include the details that the %s are based on daily averages based on selling days.<br><br>with this yr having 25 vs last yr 24; Infiniti sold 404.33 last yr each day vs 402.72 this yr each selling day.  Nissan did a similar thing, as did suzuki and vw<br><br>It is confusing considering they give total sales numbers instead of daily averages that they are reporting on.  Since AB is pulling this from somewhere else, dont think we can fault them that.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[geo.stewart]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2008 12:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/by-the-numbers-february-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/by-the-numbers-february-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[ahhh..didn't connect the dots- my bad!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[A A]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2008 12:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/by-the-numbers-february-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/by-the-numbers-february-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[I own a SAAB, but looking at these numbers I wonder why the brand is still in existence?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Johnny Aero]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2008 12:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/by-the-numbers-february-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/by-the-numbers-february-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[Saturn is a shocker. I guess the demise of the Ion cost Saturn some sales. But I would have thought that the new Astra would have picked up much of the slack, despite its higher price and especially since sales of small efficient cars are soaring. Is the Astra a dud or not enough inventory has arrived for sales to have an effect? Anyone knows how the Astra is faring? If it flops it would be a bad omen for bringing over the Corsa.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard S.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2008 12:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/by-the-numbers-february-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/by-the-numbers-february-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[Saturn has 2 basic problems.<br><br>1).  Other than actual car enthuiasts, no one even knows that the Astra exists.  I have actually never even seen one on the street.  These cars will pick up in about a year when word finally gets out to the common folk.<br><br>Hell the ?? yr old Cobalt had its best year in '07<br><br>2).  Lack of adequate number of Showrooms.  I live is the largest car market in the US.  North eastern US.  (NY\NJ\CT). There are only 6 Saturn dealerships in this region.  There are 25 GMC dealerships in the same area.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. Oak]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2008 12:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/by-the-numbers-february-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/by-the-numbers-february-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[Way too telling.  All the wannabe experts on this site going on about how everyone should bring over their euro models and they would be first in line.  Well guess what GM did it and forget being first there isn't a line at all.  Also interesting to note that the cars everyone around here dogs like the new Focus had big increases.  Show's the gap between enthusiasts and the car buying public.<br><br>For contrast since Autoblog can't be bothered to write about them you can read the Canadian sales numbers here <a href="http://tinyurl.com/3bcm43" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/3bcm43</a><br><br>In a nutshell sales in Canada were up 14.3%!<br><br>GM up 14.5%<br>Cerbyler up 5.7%<br>Ford up 4.1%<br>Toyota up 26.2%!<br>Honda up 50%!<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Judy Zik]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2008 12:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/by-the-numbers-february-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/by-the-numbers-february-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Judy; Well Saturn does sell all of its imported Astra's. The problem is they can't get enough of them. In 07 they sold 3 times more Ions than they will import in Astra's during all of 08.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2008 12:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/by-the-numbers-february-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/by-the-numbers-february-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[Mr. Oak is right.<br>Me and some friends went to see Vantage point and in the car chase Dennis Quaid drives a Chevy version of the same Astra car sold here.  One of my friends said it'd be nice if they sold it here and when I told them they do he was stunned.  Then I told told them it was sold as a Saturn and he started laughing.  I guess not everyone wants a Saturn.<br><br>The good news here is that both Ford and Chevy outsold Toyota and that Saturn is the biggest loser.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[3cubed minus 3squared plus1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2008 1:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/by-the-numbers-february-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/by-the-numbers-february-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[Saturn shifted it's target audience and didn't bother to tell anyone.  Go down to your local Saturn retailer (I did yesterday) and take a look around.  Most Saturn buyers are looking for small, entry level, vehicles.  They have only one, the Astra.  No one knows the Astra exists.<br><br>If you're looking for a small economy car, Saturn's bread and butter, they don't have much to offer.  You're better off at a Chevy dealer.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[brn]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2008 3:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/by-the-numbers-february-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/by-the-numbers-february-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[I suspect that the Saturn numbers are off because the economy is going south and people who are buying are walking in looking for deep discounts and rebates.  Since Saturn doesn't "haggle" there may be a perception that they're not great bargains now.  And from what I can see, their rebates are not spectacular compared to some of the overstocked cars of other brands out there.  <br><br>Visited a Saturn dealer yesterday for the first time.  I was appalled to see that this "straight up" brand had "sucker stickers" and dealer add-ons like pinstriping, undercoating, and paint protectant added that is of course, "non-negotiable".  So some of these affordable cars may have $1,000 of worthless BS added on.  That certainly doesn't help sales.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruno]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2008 6:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/by-the-numbers-february-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/by-the-numbers-february-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[Clearly Toyota has hit a bump in its road to world domination...they have had a few down months in a row now...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dan spalinger]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2008 12:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/by-the-numbers-february-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/by-the-numbers-february-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[Contrary to popular belief Saturn's Opel-styled lineup has not translated into a brand turnaround at all.  <br><br>In fact new Saturn sales have been pretty bleek, including the Auru, the so-called North American Car of the Year.  The Astra which is an actual Opel car will probably not be a sales success and won't do much to help Saturn's bottom line after losign the ultra crappy but ultra cheap ION.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TriShield]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2008 12:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/by-the-numbers-february-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/by-the-numbers-february-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[On the bright side Saturn is getting conquest sales but most of them are from Chevy! They also don't replace the people who buy one Saturn and never buy another with a new customer.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tagg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2008 2:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/by-the-numbers-february-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/by-the-numbers-february-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[What the hell is Mini giving away?  38%?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[YouFaceTheTick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2008 12:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/by-the-numbers-february-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/by-the-numbers-february-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[Don't be fooled by the percentage.  Mini still sells less than 4000 cars per month.<br><br>I bet the bump came mostly from replacing their old Minis with the new one.  In a few months, it'll take a dip.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. Oak]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2008 12:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/by-the-numbers-february-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/04/by-the-numbers-february-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[4000 a month is huge considering they only have two cars (that's including the new clubman).  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[YouFaceTheTick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2008 1:03PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>