<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/03/nanotech-research-stumbles-on-homemade-hydrogen/</link>
<description>Autoblog Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/03/nanotech-research-stumbles-on-homemade-hydrogen/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/03/nanotech-research-stumbles-on-homemade-hydrogen/</guid><description><![CDATA[See you have a big battery pack that runs the electrolysis machine to make the hydrogen to run the engine. Then you plug the car back in to recharge it. See it's better than a hydrogen car because you don't need filling stations and better than an electric car because it uses hydrogen.<br><br>Currently every argument about electric or hydrogen cars just seems stupid. Hopefully this technology can make battery packs smaller and more efficient for electric cars. I read about this technology before, problem is that while efficiency goes up the number of recharge cycles goes down. These batteries just do not last as long so you will have to replace the packs more often.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Iridium]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2008 11:27AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>