<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/03/geneva-08-previe-saab-9-x-biohybrid-concept/</link>
<description>Autoblog Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/03/geneva-08-previe-saab-9-x-biohybrid-concept/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/03/geneva-08-previe-saab-9-x-biohybrid-concept/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is what we've been waiting for, breathlessly?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DP]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2008 12:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/03/geneva-08-previe-saab-9-x-biohybrid-concept/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/03/geneva-08-previe-saab-9-x-biohybrid-concept/</guid><description><![CDATA[sucks!<br><br>design team needs to be replaced.these nothings going on the sides and the back is screwed up.Saab & Gm has really dropped the ball.Does it even compare to the Astra?SAAB had a chance to really earn some young professionals this clearly miss the mark.If the final product looks like this either Saturn or VW will get my money.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[the law]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2008 12:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/03/geneva-08-previe-saab-9-x-biohybrid-concept/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/03/geneva-08-previe-saab-9-x-biohybrid-concept/</guid><description><![CDATA[Thumbs up on the tech. That turbo 1.4 is a perfect size for a small car (even without a hybrid system).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chase]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2008 1:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/03/geneva-08-previe-saab-9-x-biohybrid-concept/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/03/geneva-08-previe-saab-9-x-biohybrid-concept/</guid><description><![CDATA[wtf? what's with all the waiting? and it sucks too....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2008 1:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/03/geneva-08-previe-saab-9-x-biohybrid-concept/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/03/geneva-08-previe-saab-9-x-biohybrid-concept/</guid><description><![CDATA[The greenhouse and overall design is similar to the Velostar, the replacement for the Tiburon.<br><br><a href="http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/pic.php?imagenum=1&carnum=3337" rel="nofollow">http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/pic.php?imagenum=1&carnum=3337</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[iSpec]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2008 1:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/03/geneva-08-previe-saab-9-x-biohybrid-concept/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/03/geneva-08-previe-saab-9-x-biohybrid-concept/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hyundai has always used SAAB design themes. Mitsubishi and Subaru has also used it IE:sports back cocnept the designer even say he took cues from older Saabs. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[the law]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2008 2:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/03/geneva-08-previe-saab-9-x-biohybrid-concept/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/03/geneva-08-previe-saab-9-x-biohybrid-concept/</guid><description><![CDATA[Would the government be OK with a car that blocks such large chunks of drivers view.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2008 1:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/03/geneva-08-previe-saab-9-x-biohybrid-concept/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/03/geneva-08-previe-saab-9-x-biohybrid-concept/</guid><description><![CDATA[your right Chase, tech wise it's great but the design falls flat I hope they can work out the kinks in time for production. IE: define the fenders  and center line -more ,round off the back, add the black outline to ground effects all the way around.also thin out the chunky roof;other then that back and side add the most work.just my 2 cents!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[the law]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2008 1:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/03/geneva-08-previe-saab-9-x-biohybrid-concept/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/03/geneva-08-previe-saab-9-x-biohybrid-concept/</guid><description><![CDATA[Nice try, good engine bad car design]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Esprit bird]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2008 1:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/03/geneva-08-previe-saab-9-x-biohybrid-concept/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/03/geneva-08-previe-saab-9-x-biohybrid-concept/</guid><description><![CDATA[I love it :) <br><br>Clean, swedish, rational, practical, saabish and with personality... I couldn't expect this after the lame 9-4x!<br><br>I'd buy this one! :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Yago Bal]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2008 1:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/03/geneva-08-previe-saab-9-x-biohybrid-concept/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/03/geneva-08-previe-saab-9-x-biohybrid-concept/</guid><description><![CDATA[You have got to be kidding me. This thing sucks. Give me the 9-4x.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2008 1:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/03/geneva-08-previe-saab-9-x-biohybrid-concept/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/03/geneva-08-previe-saab-9-x-biohybrid-concept/</guid><description><![CDATA[You must be from the US...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Yago Bal]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2008 1:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/03/geneva-08-previe-saab-9-x-biohybrid-concept/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/03/geneva-08-previe-saab-9-x-biohybrid-concept/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ok, so, the Mini has been around since, what, 2003?  And it's taken GM this long to produce a _concept_?  Wow, real "pull the tail on the dinosaur" syndrome at work here.<br><br>I like this, I really do.  I wish the windshield rake was a little less dramatic (more Saab 99, less Acura NSX).  The problem is this is a another pie-in-the-sky concept, from a company that's famous for flashy concepts and mundane production cars, for a brand whose newest product is from 2003 (9-3), whose flagship dates from 1998 (9-5), and whose premium product is a lame-duck rebadge (9-7x).  By the time this reaches production, it'll be fighting for it's life against similar offerings from other makes--assuming GM doesn't do it's usual "the best competitor is the competitor in your own showroom" act and sell a Saturn or Chevy/Pontiac version as well.<br><br>Saab needed something to sell in 2005.  It does not need concept and concept with nothing to show for it.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[psarhjinian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2008 1:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/03/geneva-08-previe-saab-9-x-biohybrid-concept/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/03/geneva-08-previe-saab-9-x-biohybrid-concept/</guid><description><![CDATA[The "lame" 9-7x is Saabs best seller in the states and is the most reliable Saab to date.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Frylock350]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2008 1:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/03/geneva-08-previe-saab-9-x-biohybrid-concept/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/03/geneva-08-previe-saab-9-x-biohybrid-concept/</guid><description><![CDATA[So, if I rebadge a Chevy Impala and sell it as a Cadillac and price it so that it sells well, making it "the best selling, most reliable Cadillac", does mean it's a good thing?<br><br>No.  <br><br>Ditto here.  The 9-7x sells ok _for a Saab_ but it's sales (400 units) are miserable; they were miserable last year when they sold 800.  The 9-3 does outsell it (1100-1500 units/month), though, so I don't know where the heck you got that figure from.  <br><br>The 9-7x was a waste of resources.  Saab could (and should) have spent the money on the 9-5.  Heck, they could have redressed a Saturn Vue (or Cadillac SRX) and it'd be a better fit.  Some dimwit at GM saw that Saab was losing customers because people were buying SUVs instead of wagons.  The problem is, they were buying Acura MDXs, BMW Xs, Mercedes MLs and Lexus RXs, and a slightly nicer Chevy-friggin-Trailblazer is _not_ going to staunch the bleeding, not against that kind of competition.  <br><br>And reliable?  Please.  If you wanted reliable, you wouldn't have looked at a Saab in the first place.  You'd have signed the papers on an MDX or RX350 and not even thought about Saab for a second.<br><br>Let's call a spade a spade: GM has no idea, and more importantly, no _intention_ of seriously fixing Saab.  Which is unfortunate, because unlike Buick and Pontiac, Saab's perception wasn't completely in the toilet when this all started.  It's the same cockup they made with Saturn, and from Saturn is now _barely_ recovering from (and still might not, if GM doesn't stop knifing Saturn on Chevy's behalf).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[psarhjinian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2008 4:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/03/geneva-08-previe-saab-9-x-biohybrid-concept/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/03/geneva-08-previe-saab-9-x-biohybrid-concept/</guid><description><![CDATA[hotness]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2008 1:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/03/geneva-08-previe-saab-9-x-biohybrid-concept/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/03/geneva-08-previe-saab-9-x-biohybrid-concept/</guid><description><![CDATA[i'm baffled with the term "mini-killler" or "mini-competitor" when it comes to comparing Mini with a car that shares platform with Opel Astra, Cobalt and other cars that are all significantly larger than Mini. To me, this looks more like a VW Polo, Renault Clio, Peugeot 207 competitor. Mini is still, even though it has grown, much more mini than this thing (judging from the pictures)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Milos Radulovic]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2008 1:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/03/geneva-08-previe-saab-9-x-biohybrid-concept/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/03/geneva-08-previe-saab-9-x-biohybrid-concept/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well, Saab never told it would be a mini competitor, and everybody knew for quite a while that this car would be based on the Delta platform, so I don't know were that idea came from... :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Yago Bal]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2008 1:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/03/geneva-08-previe-saab-9-x-biohybrid-concept/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/03/geneva-08-previe-saab-9-x-biohybrid-concept/</guid><description><![CDATA[quote from this article "Overall, the 9-X/1 could be a capable competitor to the MINI in the premium compact segment that's fiercely competitive in Europe, but has yet to heat up in the U.S."<br><br>if you ask me, only true size-wize competitor to Mini is Fiat 500. all other cars that try to be mini competition are really larger]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Milos Radulovic]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2008 1:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/03/geneva-08-previe-saab-9-x-biohybrid-concept/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/03/geneva-08-previe-saab-9-x-biohybrid-concept/</guid><description><![CDATA[Looks like an AMC Gremlin for the new milennium.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jruhi4]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2008 1:42PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>