In nature, only the lion and tiger are bigger cats than the jaguar, and the spotted feline is quite the predator, as prey learns when the cat's fangs penetrate their skulls. The wild jaguar is also diminishing in number. When you think about it, you can draw a parallel between the beast and the brand named after it. After all, there are bigger luxury marques with more notoriety, such as Mercedes and BMW, and it's no secret that Jaguar (especially in the United States) has been fading from the sales charts, as a peek at our By The Numbers posts will demonstrate. Like the feline predator, however, Jaguar is still no slouch at what it does.
Which brings us to the XF. The XF is The Next Big Step for Jaguar, blending modernity with big sedan proportions and dollops of luxury. Curiously, the blown mill that powers the other "R" cars is available on a standard-grade XF, so the XFR has to be better, and Auto Express has spotted it out testing. Bigger intakes in front, bigger wheels and brakes at the corners, and big power underhood are all on tap. An stout 500 horsepower is expected from the car's supercharged 5.0L V8. Out back, a spoiler and quad tips are the other telltale signs that the XFR is the most serious predator of its immediate family. Assuming it's as good as the XJR and XKR, this is one cat we're eager to tame.
[Source: Auto Express]
GM shrinks Volt's gas tank, range drops from 600 to 360 miles
MINI dealers to sell Alfa Romeos in the U.S.
Honda to reveal OSM open-top concept in London
With crisis looming, GM may unveil Volt for 100th anniversary
Next BMW M5 will nix V10 in favor of twin-turbo V8
In the Autoblog Garage: 2009 Lincoln MKS
Track Test: 2008 Roush 427R Trak Pak Mustang
In the Autoblog Garage: 2008 Porsche Cayman S
First Drive: 2009 Chevrolet Traverse
In the Autoblog Garage: 2008 Mazda MX-5 Miata Retractable Hard Top
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
LimeDaiquiri @ Mar 2nd 2008 3:05PM
If only it's "bite" went along with it's aesthetics's.
Robert @ Mar 2nd 2008 3:19PM
Im disappointed with this after seeing the concept and then the headlights on this...just now.
Robert @ Mar 2nd 2008 3:19PM
...just no*
Torrent @ Mar 2nd 2008 3:30PM
No.
FordGT @ Mar 2nd 2008 3:31PM
The XF is nearly perfect except for the headlights. They ruin the car.
Hike15 @ Mar 2nd 2008 4:35PM
I acutally really like this car a lot
true, the headlights could be better, but this is a very atractive car, especially in person.
I hope they get the XFR right because i will be a great alternative to the e55 and m5 which are both kind of boring or ugly looking in my opinion
dean @ Mar 2nd 2008 4:39PM
Its funny, the headlamp design on the XF concept looks easier to do than the production version. 500hp? That gonna trickle down to all the R variants?
SHOTT3R @ Mar 2nd 2008 5:00PM
Jaguar XFR getting ready to suck
mr.ed @ Mar 2nd 2008 5:35PM
Producing expensive vehicles that look like 5 YO Hyundais or Subarus won't help sales much. How dumb are these people?
zreeb @ Mar 2nd 2008 8:44PM
Have you seen it person?
It looks awesome!
notYou @ Mar 2nd 2008 9:49PM
I saw it in person (I related seeing it at a Jag/LR release party for NADA 2008 in San Fran about 3 weeks ago in other threads) and, sorry, but the exterior comes across as too many compromises. Rear, rear 3/4, profile are all decent to good, but it goes downhill from there. The headlights are the worst (and literally look cheap, as in "the hyundai tiburon team dissmissed them...last year") and the creases on the hood are forced and overwrought appearance (maybe they look better on the R). No leaping cat, instead we've got the new screaming-cat ("me too! me too!") badge in the middle of the mesh grille. Ugh. My girlfriend (who loves classic Jags) pronounced it as looking "cheap". And would not have confused it for a jag had I not told her it was.
Oh yes, beautiful interior. So I'm sure the occupants feel great when riding inside. But the image conscious will be forever wondering why nobody outside is looking at their car.
Maybe tech will catch up when it's time to refresh the car and they'll be able to revamp it to the show-car level. But as it is, it's a great car, but a mediocre jag.
Nathan @ Mar 3rd 2008 9:08AM
...don't forget ten year old american cars. I know I've seen those headlights somewhere. hmmm, let me think...oh yeah
http://www.dragtimes.com/images/1089910887P0000737.JPG
they looked cheap then and they def. look cheap now.
Andrew Tanasescu @ Mar 2nd 2008 7:17PM
Wow, what hatred for such a car. I admit, its not the best looking, and it probably wont perform the best. But I dont think Jaguar would just kind of throw a car out there that would suck. Personally, I LOVE the new interior of the XF and that back is gorgeous. Its a pity they made that front the way they did. I had the XF concept is a desktop background for the longest time cause I thought it was gorgeous. But I still reserve my final judgement for when I see this car in person. I dont think it will be as bad as everyone makes it seem...
jgp @ Mar 3rd 2008 7:07AM
The XF is pretty (except maybe the headlights), but it doesn't look like a Jaguar.
Jaguars should be long, low, and catlike. The XF is too tall, and the belt line is way too high. This would make a _great_ Volvo flagship, but I'm not feeling the Jag vibe here.
I'm sick of people saying the design is bad in and of itself--come on, it has the Holden Commodore's side profile and the Lexus GS's roofline--it looks nice. It's just not a Jag.
V.G.STAN @ Mar 23rd 2008 11:14PM
Somewhat disapointed with the XF. Wanted to move up from X-Type sport, but I'll enjoy my X-Type some more. First the chrome window trims must go..it degrades the car. Second, they should produce a 350-360 HP engine to give the power enthusists another level away from what mom and pop drives. I know the supercharged version is available, but segmenting the market and competing with the Lexus and Bmw would help sales...maybe the custom shops will create a more laid look.I'm waiting to see.