<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/02/canada-finally-gets-the-mitsubishi-lancer-evolution/</link>
<description>Autoblog Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/02/canada-finally-gets-the-mitsubishi-lancer-evolution/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/02/canada-finally-gets-the-mitsubishi-lancer-evolution/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well this is nothing new, just another example of government busy-bodies taking the choice from consumers' and causing the prices to rise. <br><br>I think it's completely moronic to suggest that Canadian safety regulations are somehow better than those of US or EU. Having to adopt vehicles to each region adds roughly 25% to the cost. What needs to be done is for NA and EU to have one set of safety regulations - a convergence if you will. <br><br>That will drastically reduce costs for our domestic manufacturers trying to succeed in foreign markets and it'll make easier for importers to enter NA market. <br><br>Conservatives, Liberals - it does not matter one bit. Politicians do nothing but create inflation and drive up the prices. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Noidor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 2nd 2008 1:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/02/canada-finally-gets-the-mitsubishi-lancer-evolution/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/02/canada-finally-gets-the-mitsubishi-lancer-evolution/</guid><description><![CDATA[The bumper regs are driven by private industry (in the case, the insurance companies), not government.  They lobbied good and hard for the bumper crash test.<br><br>This isn't socialism, it's corporatism.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[psarhjinian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 2nd 2008 8:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/02/canada-finally-gets-the-mitsubishi-lancer-evolution/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/02/canada-finally-gets-the-mitsubishi-lancer-evolution/</guid><description><![CDATA[Exactly... any government would prefer to tax you 14% (GST & PST) on $42,993, than 14% on $32,990.  That's an increased revenue of $1,400.42 per every Evolution sold.  I'm glad I've moved from Toronto to Chicago to get these kind of savings on vehicles.  Except that I miss the medical coverage that I got in Canada, compared to the PPO here in the US.  And that's another story...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[PiCASSO]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 2nd 2008 11:14PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>