Add your comments
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments.
New KITT Attack Mode revealed at Comic Con
London 2008: Honda OSM concept roadster says, "Cheerio!"
London 2008: Lotus unveils the Evora
2010 Chevy Camaro - Official Details and Images
2010 Chevy Camaro - LIVE from the reveal
First Drive: Maserati Quattroporte S in Europe
First Drive: 2008 MINI Cooper S JCW
In the Autoblog Garage:2009 Nissan GT-R
North American Exclusive First Drive: Alfa MiTo
First Drive: 2009 Kia Borrego
Reader Comments for
Subscribe to this threadAre cars too safe to be... safe?
(Page 1 of 1)
psarhjinian @ Mar 23rd 2008 4:53PM
Ok, so the choice is between possibly dying if ER crews cannot cut me out quickly enough, versus certain death in some old clunker that at least they'll be able to scrape my remains out of easily.
I'll take the first option, thanks.
This is about as newsworthy as the old adages about people drowning because of seatbelts, therefore seatbelts were unsafe.
info @ Mar 23rd 2008 5:27PM
indeed. The whole article is a bunch of BS.
Kaptain75329 @ Mar 23rd 2008 11:23PM
+1
Especially since it's not unreasonable to assume rescue crews will adapt over time.