Add your comments
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments.










Reader Comments for
Subscribe to this threadHuh? Fewer 16-year olds are getting their licenses
(Page 1 of 1)
John @ Feb 29th 2008 11:44AM
Many factors at play here: tougher laws, expensive insurance, expensive gas, teens spending money on tech toys not cars, to name a few.
Its fine by me. If you've seen the death rate for 16-17 year old drivers and the accidents they cause I'm in no hurry to see them on the road anyways.
geo.stewart @ Feb 29th 2008 2:42PM
delaying the inevitable.
an inexperienced driver is an inexperienced driver no matter the age 16 or 18.
the cure is more stringent driving tests, required instruction time, and a field test that takes 5 hrs instead of 5 minutes.
Irfan @ Feb 29th 2008 4:54PM
its not just the experience, its the maturity. When I got my license at 16 I sped like crazy, for fun. 10 years later I dont go more than 9 over. Had I gotten my license at 20 instead of 16, I feel Id have endangered much fewer lives per year. yes a 20 year old wouldnt necessarily be a "good" driver, but they have a higher chance of being a responsible one.