<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/26/vantastic-2009-e-series-upgrades/</link>
<description>Autoblog Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/26/vantastic-2009-e-series-upgrades/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/26/vantastic-2009-e-series-upgrades/</guid><description><![CDATA[First of all, I drive a Nissan 350Z. Second, I hope your father-in-law is not responsible for the interior design or finishing details:  Looking tough does not mean having to look butt-ugly. Case in point was the first updated full-size Dodge Ram pick-up. It had the look of a big rig, but done in  <br>good proportions, thus giving a nice look overall.  The proportions of the new fascia of the E-series does not correspond to the overall design of the van. the Dodge/Freightliner Sprinter accomplishes that, while still looking purposeful and utilitarian.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard S.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 27th 2008 7:52PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>