<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/26/audi-announces-the-44mpg-tt-2-0-tdi-quattro/</link>
<description>Autoblog Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/26/audi-announces-the-44mpg-tt-2-0-tdi-quattro/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/26/audi-announces-the-44mpg-tt-2-0-tdi-quattro/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Dondel <br><br>Thats WRONG<br>in Europe manufacotrs have to claim the fuel consuption and CO2 rating after a exact routine called Euro Norm... All cars have to drive exactly the same test routine for that reason for all manufactor count the same rules if quoting consuption. The only thing that is unrealistic this test run is driven with everything turned off.. no air condition running, no radio on, no lights on..nothing that increase the consuption. But this routin is still more realistic as every US consuption claim... the magic numbers claimed in the USA by some companys specialy for Hybrid model are from Fantasy Island and NEVER reached in Europe.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nagmashot]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 27th 2008 1:10AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>