Add your comments
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments.













Reader Comments for
Subscribe to this threadNew fuel economy report to finally recommend diesels and hybrids for first time
(Page 1 of 1)
DC @ Feb 23rd 2008 12:29AM
Nathan, you still have some digging to do. Do you think an engine supplying electricity to 4 hub motors is going to have a constant load and rpm? That negates the advantage of series hybrids you cite - steady operating state. As spw alludes to, series hybrids may allow peak engine efficiency, but a parallel or parallel/series hybrid make the best use of the energy, since it can both take advantage of efficient engine operating conditions AND the efficient mechanical transmission of engine power at steady speeds. The comparison to trains just shows your lack of understanding - trains can use this "series" drive without a battery because the engine is able to respond to power demands fast enough for the purposes of a locomotive - not so with a car without seriously compromising your series hybrid "peak efficiency" idea. And yeah, while we're at it, lets use 4 hub motors for the fun of it instead of just one. Series hybrids do have a place however.
It is also nuts that you believe biodiesel is carbon neutral. So all the tractors and trucks in the distribution run B100, they clear no land to grow it, and they don't use fertilizers derived from fossil fuels? Right.