Add your comments
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments.
Audi A3 TDI Clubsport Quattro concept
Spy Shots: Production Audi TT Clubsport Quattro
Chevy Camaro getting early unveil at Indy in September
James Garner recovering from mild stroke
VIDEO: God's ringtone is a V10-powered Audi R8
First Drive: 2009 Ford Escapes, more of almost everything
Autoline on Autoblog with John McElroy
In the Autoblog Garage: 2008 Ford Shelby GT500 Mustang
Future Classic: 1984 Chrysler Minivans
_thumbnail.jpg "Lamborghini Reventon unboxed in Las Vegas")
Reader Comments for
Subscribe to this threadTata hearts Land Rover... Jag, not so much
(Page 1 of 1)
Mr. Oak @ Feb 19th 2008 4:51PM
The Jaguar workers. Maybe then they'll building cars as if their lives depended on it. Without a total rethinking of their entire product line, their is no point to them staying in existence.
Successful car companied should not continue playing this game of "Hot-Potato" with this company.
Their Sports car (XK) should be sporty, you think?
Their Luxury car (XJ) should be gunning for the Bentleys and RRs etc. only more athletic.
Their mid-line car XF or S-Type should become a true Sports Sedan. Hell, if Cadillac can do it....
Their entry level car should appeal to younger demographic. Imagine Jaguar style with EVO\WRX attitude? Instead they now sell to blue and silver haired empty nesters.