Add your comments
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments.
Spy Shots: Production Audi TT Clubsport Quattro
Chevy Camaro getting early unveil at Indy in September
James Garner recovering from mild stroke
VIDEO: God's ringtone is a V10-powered Audi R8
IIHS releases official results on the smart fortwo
First Drive: 2009 Ford Escapes, more of almost everything
Autoline on Autoblog with John McElroy
In the Autoblog Garage: 2008 Ford Shelby GT500 Mustang
Future Classic: 1984 Chrysler Minivans
_thumbnail.jpg "Lamborghini Reventon unboxed in Las Vegas")
Reader Comments for
Subscribe to this threadTata hearts Land Rover... Jag, not so much
(Page 1 of 1)
AlexP @ Feb 19th 2008 4:03PM
With sales that are starting to pick up, I don't understand why Ford would still want to get rid of Jaguar.
Mr. Oak @ Feb 19th 2008 4:25PM
Alex: It's simple. Ford laid out quite a bit of coin to buy Jaguar, and some more coin to build their plants up to modern standards. Ford has not seen a nickle's worth of return on their investment. Instead, ther continually hemmorage cash. Time to cut your losses.