<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog - Comments for Cerberus gives reasons why Chrysler could flop</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/19/cerberus-gives-reasons-why-chrysler-could-flop/</link>
<description>Autoblog Comments for Cerberus gives reasons why Chrysler could flop</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cerberus gives reasons why Chrysler could flop]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/19/cerberus-gives-reasons-why-chrysler-could-flop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/19/cerberus-gives-reasons-why-chrysler-could-flop/</guid><description><![CDATA[No mention on if they design cars that nobody wants at the price that they are charging?  Yes, I don't have the time to read 9 pages... but I would think that would be point number 1...."Reason Number 1 we could fail.  Nobody wants to buy our products."]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rocketboy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 19th 2008 10:10AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>