<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/11/nissan-considering-infiniti-gt-r/</link>
<description>Autoblog Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/11/nissan-considering-infiniti-gt-r/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/11/nissan-considering-infiniti-gt-r/</guid><description><![CDATA[Oh no, not more 'badge engineering'.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Cavaretti]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 11th 2008 10:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/11/nissan-considering-infiniti-gt-r/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/11/nissan-considering-infiniti-gt-r/</guid><description><![CDATA[What's the point.  10-30k more (my guess) and a better interior, and probably less performance (handling) because it needs to be more luxurious?<br><br>How about this - make more GT-R's and ship them to Infiniti dealers unchanged.  Sure it says Nissan, but anyone dropping 70k isn't going to sneeze because of the name.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MemphisNET]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 11th 2008 10:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/11/nissan-considering-infiniti-gt-r/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/11/nissan-considering-infiniti-gt-r/</guid><description><![CDATA[Doesn't really make any sense to me.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SPF]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 11th 2008 10:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/11/nissan-considering-infiniti-gt-r/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/11/nissan-considering-infiniti-gt-r/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think this would work only if they could rebody it, make it look different from the GT-R.  It's very difficult to do, with hardpoints already established and tooling costs, etc. -- unless these considerations have already been factored in and Nissan has managed to keep it secret (which I don't think would be too hard to do, given the utter hoopla over the GT-R).  <br>So, unless it's just a rebadge, it probably wouldn't work.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gooch]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 11th 2008 10:51AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/11/nissan-considering-infiniti-gt-r/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/11/nissan-considering-infiniti-gt-r/</guid><description><![CDATA[Would make perfect sense to stuff the GT-R powerplant into an Infiniti 4-door coupe (i.e. CLS) and market it as the performance/luxury halo for the brand without competing with the Nissan GT-R.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TBlueMax]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 11th 2008 10:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/11/nissan-considering-infiniti-gt-r/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/11/nissan-considering-infiniti-gt-r/</guid><description><![CDATA[That is a great idea for a new Q. <br><br>[Fix the reply button, por favor!]]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John R]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 11th 2008 10:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/11/nissan-considering-infiniti-gt-r/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/11/nissan-considering-infiniti-gt-r/</guid><description><![CDATA[That's the best idea I've heard in a long time.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Franz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 11th 2008 1:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/11/nissan-considering-infiniti-gt-r/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/11/nissan-considering-infiniti-gt-r/</guid><description><![CDATA[Good idea IMO.<br>Could probably lure Porsche buyers with an Infiniti version as opposed to Corvette/Shelby/Challenger crowd.<br><br>And Infiniti needs this.<br>It already lacks a proper flagship.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Longhorn]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 11th 2008 10:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/11/nissan-considering-infiniti-gt-r/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/11/nissan-considering-infiniti-gt-r/</guid><description><![CDATA[Speculation is fun.<br><br>How about a detuned GT-R to ostensibly make some 380/400hp (pruely for the insurance brokers, but in actuality 415/420hp), provide a better interior and ride comfort.<br><br>Doesn't necessarily need to be AWD, RWD might be more fun. Set the M3 as a benchmark and price it as such.<br><br>The End. Roll Credits.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John R]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 11th 2008 10:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/11/nissan-considering-infiniti-gt-r/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/11/nissan-considering-infiniti-gt-r/</guid><description><![CDATA[Insurance companies use actuarial tables to select insurance rates, not HP ratings. And masquerading a 420HP car as a 400HP car is nutty anyway, because a car isn't going to be in fewer accidents just because it has 5% less HP anyway.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[why not the LS2LS7?]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 11th 2008 12:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/11/nissan-considering-infiniti-gt-r/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/11/nissan-considering-infiniti-gt-r/</guid><description><![CDATA[That is a great idea for a new Q]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John R]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 11th 2008 10:55AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/11/nissan-considering-infiniti-gt-r/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/11/nissan-considering-infiniti-gt-r/</guid><description><![CDATA[As a rule, I don't like silver cars, but this stainless steel is hawt.  Its too bad more cars aren't offered like this.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[FSM]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 11th 2008 10:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/11/nissan-considering-infiniti-gt-r/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/11/nissan-considering-infiniti-gt-r/</guid><description><![CDATA[The Infiniti dealers need to mellow a touch.  No one cared that there wasn't a Lincoln version of the Ford GT.  <br><br>The kind of people that would buy the GTR, aren't looking for an Infiniti badge.  They're looking for a GTR.  While Infiniti customers think performance is cool, they're not looking at GTR class performance.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[brn]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 11th 2008 11:01AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/11/nissan-considering-infiniti-gt-r/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/11/nissan-considering-infiniti-gt-r/</guid><description><![CDATA[Acura dealers were angry they didn't get the S2000 though. And Cadillac has their own Vette.<br><br>This doesn't seem like a terrible idea.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[why not the LS2LS7?]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 11th 2008 12:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/11/nissan-considering-infiniti-gt-r/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/11/nissan-considering-infiniti-gt-r/</guid><description><![CDATA[The point is moot, whatever version you make, it can't outperform the company's flagship sports car. So it would be just a detuned version of the GT-R. Die hard Infinity buyers don't want that...<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Corey W.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 11th 2008 11:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/11/nissan-considering-infiniti-gt-r/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/11/nissan-considering-infiniti-gt-r/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't care if you call it a Datsun.  Someone just please give it an interior that doesn't look like an 80's Camry.  It is quite possibly the ugliest interior I've ever seen.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 11th 2008 11:16AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/11/nissan-considering-infiniti-gt-r/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/11/nissan-considering-infiniti-gt-r/</guid><description><![CDATA[Has anyone yet commented in any of these threads that the GT-R is butt-ugly?  To me it is a modern iteration of the worst aspects of '70s Japanese design.  Ugliest performance car since the Porsche Cayenne.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mark]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 11th 2008 11:38AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/11/nissan-considering-infiniti-gt-r/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/11/nissan-considering-infiniti-gt-r/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sounds like you haven't seen it in person.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John R]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 11th 2008 11:48AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/11/nissan-considering-infiniti-gt-r/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/11/nissan-considering-infiniti-gt-r/</guid><description><![CDATA[Stupid idea.<br><br>That'd be like having a Chrysler Viper or a Pontiac Corvette in the US.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TriShield]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 11th 2008 11:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/11/nissan-considering-infiniti-gt-r/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/11/nissan-considering-infiniti-gt-r/</guid><description><![CDATA[haha.... maybe you missed this -- <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chrysler_Firepower" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chrysler_Firepower</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BAMF]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 11th 2008 3:05PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>