GM may have just half the market share it had 30 years ago, but the Detroit-based automaker still seems to have as many dealers as McDonald's has drive-thrus. The General has slashed more than 2,000 dealerships over the past 12 years, but the company will accelerate closings in order to right-size its sales outlets. GM closed 260 stores in 2007 and another 23 in January of this year, but according to Automotive News, the automaker still has a sizable 6,753 member dealer body. That number seems even higher when considering that US number two automaker Toyota makes do with only 1,445 retail locations.Sales VP Mark LeNeve told Automotive News that GM has a lot of work ahead regarding dealer closings, and that the General will speed its efforts. While fewer dealers will likely mean that you'll have to drive a few miles further to get that Chevy or Cadillac you want, the remaining stores will make more money. (Or that's the general idea, at least.) Additional profits should enable dealers to spend more on advertising and facility upgrades to try and attract more customers.
[Source: Auto News (subs. req'd)]
Pontiac El Cami-"NO"
Spy Shots: Baby Cayenne caught on 'Ring!
First Peek: 2009 Dodge Ram R/T
Spy Shots: Corvette ZR1 attacking the Nurburgring
2008 International Engine of the Year awards announced...
Autoline on Autoblog with John McElroy
First Drive: 2009 Volkswagen Jetta Sportwagen
Project Track Slut, Part One: Pick a weapon on the cheap
By the Numbers: April 2008
First Drive: 2008 Shelby GT500KR, Part 2
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
ibhiuhui @ Feb 10th 2008 12:23PM
Yawn. Who cares.
rndmnme @ Feb 10th 2008 12:48PM
Which one?
Whitie @ Feb 10th 2008 1:01PM
I think GM needs to learn from Toyota. Cut out some brands and cut out the associated dealers at the same time... focus only on brands and models that sell well.
almost Dr. G.. @ Feb 10th 2008 1:20PM
more money for advertising and less for the employees who are getting the boot out of their dealerships. win win for GM.
AZMike @ Feb 10th 2008 1:48PM
this is such a crackup, always assuming that Toyota "always does the right thing".
perhaps some who feel this way should look back to Japan. Toyota sells vehicles thru EIGHT different franchises there.
it will be interesting to see how Mr. LeNeve will propose doing this. GM only has two choices, either by buying out the dealer's franchise directly, or suggest (and ONLY suggest) a possible consolidation with another dealer.
Chrysler had done a similar thing in Califorina back in the early 90s. I owned a Dodge dealer, and they felt the area was "overdealered" by three dealers. they made me a very handsome offer, and we closed the point. however, today the offers aren't all that handsome, and a dealer is under no obligation to do anything the factory wants him to. thankfully, very strong franchise laws in every state protect the dealer, and any other business that is threatened by a manufacturer or distributor with strong-arm tactics.
I've said this several times; take away choices, and competition becomes collusion...never beneficial for a buyer.
AZMike
caddy dave @ Feb 10th 2008 2:28PM
Where's Oby? This is where he normaly posts his hatred of GM, (the company that terminated him). Can't wait to read his rant. Might have to wait, rumor has it he's out trying to get his Camry started.
Kumar @ Feb 10th 2008 2:56PM
The choices today aren't what they used to be. People tend to forget that online sales grow each year.
You can only go so far depending on the average walk up sucker to buy cars on the lot. At some point, to be successful, dealerships will need to target and take care of the internet buyers.
Gardiner Westbound @ Feb 10th 2008 4:29PM
As the Detroit-3's sales decrease the excess dealer issue will sort itself out without buyouts or violating state franchising laws.
cowboy bob @ Feb 10th 2008 4:53PM
What am I missing here? Doesn't the very existance of several dealerships, offering the same product, help the consumer? Does this also not help the manufacturer in the benefit of selling more vehicles from, say three dealerships that reduce their selling price (hence, their profit) to "move" more vehicles? One guy selling things, cars or tomatoes, will always ask more money if there is no competition. I saw this happen here when Ford bought back three area dealerships, and went to a "corporate store". Within a year the new set-up was offering less for trades, and less "dealer markdown". Guess what happened! Within another year, Ford sold the corporate store to a private dealer, and also franchised anothe dealer six miles down the road. Guess the sales figures didn't pan out as expected "eh? Duh!!!!
Mallory @ Feb 11th 2008 1:27PM
Too many dealers mean they spend scarce resources competing with each other instead of brands from other companies. It also means that the Buick dealer selling 100 cars per year doesn't have the same resources as the Toyota dealer that sells 1600. That includes advertising, marketing , promotions, as well as money for the best mechanics, top salespeople and clean, modern facilities.
For GM to be healthy it's dealer network must be healthy, and right now there are about twice as many dealerships as there should be for GM to be healthy.
Harrison @ Feb 10th 2008 5:39PM
Yeah, but they sell different things.
Honda, for example, has (or had, I know for sure they did this in the '90s) 3 different networks: Verno, Clio, and something I can't remember. Each sells different cars for different purposes. One sold Kei-cars and Civics, while the others sold more upmarket products.
Rene Curry @ Feb 10th 2008 9:19PM
They need to offer the redundant dealers in heavy populated city regions the opportunity to become "GM World Car" dealers.
A GM World Dealers could be created to sell low volume, high margin GM models from around the world that are not slated for the conventional dealers like Chevrolet, Pontiac, Buick, Saturn, GMC, Saab, & Hummer.
GM could spend money by helping the dealer upgrade for this mission rather than spend money to buy them out. This World Car dealer option has risks & costs, but there is potential for a return and prestige. The other option is just throwing money out the window buying out dealers.
Rene Curry @ Feb 10th 2008 9:25PM
Forgot to add... The GM World Car dealers would also get specialized vehicles from GM approved suppliers like Rousch, Saleen , etc.
stratojet @ Feb 10th 2008 9:30PM
GM closes a dealer (along with a hefty$$$ amount). The customers will not necessary go to the other GM dealership. He may very well go to the numerous other franchises around. The best way is to lead the dealers to buy the business of the other and doing so, eliminate excessive cost to the corporation. Or, let the market terminate the unprofitable Dealers.
SilverAero @ Feb 10th 2008 10:20PM
That picture reminds me of Hannibal Lecter
rgseidl @ Feb 11th 2008 9:04AM
There are laws in every state that give franchisees a lot of protection against such action by their franchisors. It cost GM a billion dollars to wrap up Oldsmobile, mostly in compensation for the dealerships that had to close.
David @ Feb 11th 2008 10:28AM
This makes complete sense to anyone in Michigan. You can hardly throw a rock without hitting a Chevy dealership and half of them are going broke anyway. If the car market in Michigan stays the way it is for a few more years GM won't have to urge dealerships to close . . . they will just be out of business.
alex @ Feb 13th 2008 4:30PM
@whitie
they can't just "cut out" the dealers. ever heard of franchise laws? that's why it is incredibly difficult/expensive to reduce the number of dealers or cut a brand